Sunday, February 7, 2016


With each passing day, I have more and more respect for Russia and its people. In fact, I think many American men should take note of situations like this one and learn from the Russians what it means to be a real man. Unfortunately, thanks to the Jewish influence in our country, most American men are too busy masturbating to pornography and/or getting wasted on drugs or alcohol to truly stand in their power. Perhaps this has something to do with the damage done to the male psyche through infant circumcision – something that does not happen in Russia and that gives the Russian men real power. Those who are circumcised (i.e., Israeli and American men) often think it is “manly” to sign up to work for the dark side, going off to war to kill innocent men, women and children and/or becoming police officers so they can defend the banksters’ interests.

Well, today is a good day to rise up and take note of what it means to be a real man. The Russians have demonstrated this boldly and oh, how I wish American men would start doing the very same thing.

Refugees Go Clubbing In Russia, Harass Girls, Wake Up In Hospital The Next Morning

A group of 51 refugees were brutally assaulted outside a night club in Murmansk, Russia, after they groped and molested women at a night club Saturday.

The refugees had previously been ordered to leave Norway for “bad behavior” and tried their luck in Russia. What they didn’t realize when they went out clubbing in Murmansk is that Russians have less tolerance when it comes to sexual assault on local women than other European countries.

The refugees allegedly groped and harassed women in a similar manner as the assaults in Cologne on New Year’s Eve. A group of male Russian took them aside to “educate” them that “Cologne is 2,500 kilometers south of here.”

The refugees tried to flee but were quickly captured by the Russians. They then took them out to the street and gave them a beating they will remember. Police arrived to break up the fight but locals report that they threw a few punches at the refugees before arresting 33 of them. Eighteen refugees were in such bad condition they had to be take to the hospital.

Friday, February 5, 2016


Friends - Things are getting really weird. The dark ones deleted my vimeo account without any warning whatsoever. I learned about it by someone sending me an email saying they could not play one of my videos. After days of trying to reach Vimeo, they finally told me they deleted my account because I posted content that violates their standards. End of story. Case closed.


Sadly, I cannot access my facebook accounts either -- and I have not been blocked! They have just fixed things technically so that I cannot open either of my facebook accounts on any browser. They are messing with my yahoo email accounts as well and I was unable to access one of my accounts for several days, and the shit goes on.

I ask those of you who would like to stay in contact with me to do the following:

1. Send an email to and let me know you would like to be added to my mailing list.

2. Go to my website: and sign up for updates.

3. Please follow my blog and comment on my posts so I can know you are out there.

Hopefully this interference will be over quickly but right now, I think it is important for me to take these steps to maintain contact with you.

Thanks and I hope to hear from you and reconnect with you soon.

Here's a story that explains what is going on...

Source Article:
Under Threats from Jewish Groups, TalkStreamLive Drops Inside the Eye – Live! from Saturday Line-up

Under threats from Jewish media censors monitoring TalkStreamLive, TalkStreamLive has removed without any notification the popular political talk show, Inside the Eye – Live! with The Fetch, from TalkStreamLive’s Saturday aggregation line-up. Sources note that Jewish groups have been active in monitoring online media sites in an effort to put a total blanket on the information flowing out to the American people and larger global community and that Inside the Eye – Live! was specifically targeted for deletion from TalkStreamLive’s aggregation Saturday morning line-up.

Unseen and Unaccountable Jewish Censors in the Alternative News Media Market

Indeed, there has been a disturbing trend in the alternative streaming news segment. When seen in the light of defacto operating unaccountable Jewish censors, Americans and the world at large are seeing their choices of media programming increasing censored, including completely disappeared from the World Wide Web, in an effort by Jews to preclude any mention of Jewish involvement in the theft of trillions of dollars from the United States economy, Jewish involvement in the poisoning of the food supply, Jewish involvement in the phony “War on Terror”, Jewish involvement in the attack on the United States known as “9-11″, and Jewish media manipulations, to name but a few.

All of the above realities, plus the Jewish involvement in the attempted frame-up of the Syrian government in the use of chemical weapons in the early part of May, 2013, hint at an agenda by global Jewish interests to bring the citizenry of Western civilization powers into another war in the Middle East for the benefit of Jewish geopolitical interests.

And it is precisely this effort to keep reality “under the blanket” and out of sight and earshot that has de-facto Jewish censors working tireless to bully and threaten website owners and aggregators. Traditional American and Western values of free speech are being ground down in favor of an Orwellian Jewish Bolshevik construction.

As Alexsandr Solzhenitsyn so aptly revealed,

“We can not state, that all Jews are Bolsheviks. But: Without Jews there would never have been Bolshevism. For a Jew nothing is more insulting than the truth. The blood-maddened Jewish terrorists had murdered sixty-six million victims in Russia from 1918 to 1957!”

Jewish Imposed Constructions on Language

The idea of “imposed constructions on language” are not so difficult to comprehend: the manner in which constructions are imposed is through a focused effort to control definitions and word usage. In this area, owing largely to Jewish control of media cultural (film) assets and intelligentsia (higher education), the task of controlling definitions and accepted “word usage” has proven to be markedly easy and effective.

When we factor in the absolute disdain Jews have towards non Jews as regards “free speech”, and in light of active and overt effort by Jews to impose partial to absolute censorship, we must factor in that success in destroying the free flow of ideas is magnified through what appears to be in many places a Jewish control of the legal system.

Threats of legal action are enough to bring down even the most staunch supporter of Western values regarding free speech, and Jews use this threat to an almost exclusive degree. However, the idea of Jews “suing people” to impose public censorship is such an intellectual affront that a healthy court system would laugh Jews who tried such a legal assault straight out of court, with a kick in the behind in the form of massive fines as penalties for the wasting of peoples, and the courts, time.

But such is not the case: corruption and rot of Western values seems nearly complete. Nowhere is this more evident than when a PRIVATE UNKNOWN JEWISH ENTITY can IMPOSE LITERAL CENSORSHIP through targeting large cume alternative media outlets. It is as if cowards, hiding in the shadows, unable to effect their agenda, use lies and the threat of legal force to impose their agenda.

It is a form soft but very real form of TOTALITARIANISM practiced by Jews.

No self respecting Western civilized person would dare to accept the verbal and intellectual assault of some PRIVATE person, Jewish or otherwise, telling the collective what we can and can’t say, what we can and can’t hear, and whom we can and can’t freely associate, for it is through our words that we communicate: we speak, we listen, and we associate based on the actions and ideals that travel and coalesce within communication structures.

ALLOWING PRIVATE JEWISH INDIVIDUALS OR ENTITIES to IMPOSE CENSORSHIP is a DIRECT ASSAULT on not just “free speech”, but the very Western right to freely associate. Take away the communication, and the right to associate rapidly follows.

A Case Study – Orion Talk Radio “Cleans up their act.”

In this light we can further understand the disturbing trends towards self censorship of those afraid of Jewish tyranny, those who support Jewish tyranny, the very real imposed censorship by Jewish individuals and entities on our collective rights as they seek to bring about tyranny.

A case in point is the rather sudden declaration by Orion Talk Radio, a moderate sized streaming political talk radio station, who was forced to “clean up their act” and publicly embarrassed themselves with a treatise that could only be seen as written by Jewish censors seeking to justify their right to censor our collective ability to speak, hear – and thus associate.

Said the statement from Orion Talk Radio,

“As part of the US Constitutional Bill of Rights, the 1st amendment guarantees (and we quote here)…

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Orion Talk Radio’s ghost scribbler pontificated with a plethora of charged Jewish insanities. Consider this bit of opined Talmudic intelligence:

“All too often, those who wish to engage in such reckless talk will always attempt to hide their offensive speech behind the Constitutional right to free speech.”

Here we see a loaded sentence filled with Jewish language constructions. First and foremost, “who” gets to determine what is and is not a “reckless” use of the language? Are we to presume that only Jews know how to use the language and that intelligent mature adults across the political spectrum who are raising awareness of Jewish mismanagement in all phases of their political, economic, and social activities are somehow not quite clear and intent on what they are saying?

Further. Who is defining “reckless”? How is it being used? Is it being used in a manner that is purely understood from a Jewish group think strategy, an academic framed absurdity, or…?

“Reckless”, in this case, is cleary an open ended language construction that has been charged to Jewish social and literary constructions. It means absolutely nothing to a non -Jew unless a non – Jew wishes to make it mean something. In reality, such open ended language constructions are forms of intellectual violence intended to insult and assault the intelligent and unsuspecting alike. To the intelligent, we see the absurdity and intended insult and assault on our intelligence. To the unsuspecting, the real target of Jewish language constructions, the attempt is to create a political mass willing to bend to Jewish political agendas and through “democracy”, enforce graduated levels of Jewish constructed tyranny.

Further, as regards the phrase, “trying to hide behind freedom of speech”: how can anyone INTELLIGENTLY claim that someone is “trying to hide behind free speech”? The truth of the matter here is that this ghost scribbler for Orion Talk Radio was projecting onto their target. It is the “ghost scribbler” here who was and remains seeking to “hide behind free speech”, for the real intent of the ghost scribbler is to deny others their right to speak freely.

In truth, “Free speech” is simply the palette upon which all communication is caste. It is a utility used for communication. Thus, to those of us who are prodigy of the progenitors of Western Civilization and the ideal of freedom of speech and the resultant freedom of association and assembly, the idea that somehow we need to “hide” behind “freedom of speech” is an intellectual absurdity.

Freedom of speech is the palette upon which we create the free flow of ideas, and so long as that palette is open to all, then what is right and good will always prevail for the arguments and logic of Reason will always resonate more strongly in the hearts and minds of humanity that the arguments and logic of the Tyrant.

Thus we have nothing to fear and certainly no need to “hide behind freedom of speech”. So long as we enable and allow ABSOLUTE FREEDOM OF SPEECH relative to the free flow of ideals, we have nothing to fear. Falsities will sink and drown while the truth will rise and float as an iceberg upon the seas.

The use of crafted impositions on the language with the intent to destroy “freedom of speech” is being done precisely to deny enough ice from forming such that the collective truths raise themselves above the Seas.


History is most definitely repeating itself. Take the time to watch this short video and in just four minutes, you will learn about true history.

What The Jews Did To Germany, They Are Now Doing To The USA


Medical pervert, Dr. David Newman, is wanted for questioning in the sexual assault of a 22-year-old emergency room patient

I hope people are beginning to fully grasp the depraved nature of the Jewish influence in our country and within the medical system itself. Because of the Jewish influence, the sexual torture and genital mutilation of infants has become the norm, and as I have documented extensively in my book, Birth Trauma and the Dark Side of Modern Medicine, sexual assault of all kinds by American doctors is a common occurrence in American hospitals. In addition to performing unnecessary episiotomies, hysterectomies, mastectomies, etc., doctors are also involved in outright raping unconscious women while they under the affect of anesthesia. These psychos get off on giving women paralyzing drugs so they cannot move while they are being raped, and sometimes this is combined with amnesia drugs so the women will not remember what happened to them. Too bad for the perverts, however, is the fact that many women DO remember what the doctors have done to them and more and more of these debased "professionals" are being arrested for their crimes.

The day is at hand when all of their filthy behavior is being exposed. The avalanche of Truth is now unstoppable and it will be a happy day when Mankind stands up to these disgusting entities and extinguishes them and all forms of evil from our planet.

Source Articles:
NYC – jewish doctor accused of ejaculating on patient

Exclusive: Mount Sinai doc accused of ejaculating on patient

A prominent doctor at Mount Sinai Hospital is the target of an NYPD investigation after a 22-year-old patient accused him of knocking her out with morphine and ejaculating on her face, the Daily News has learned.

Dr. David Newman — an emergency physician described as a leading voice for health care reforms — has been questioned by detectives but not taken into custody, police said Thursday. The Manhattan District Attorney’s office is also involved in the probe, police said.

The 45-year-old Iraq War veteran has already been barred from seeing patients as the investigation plays out, hospital officials said.

“We are aware of an allegation that has been made against one of our physicians,” the hospital said in a statement. “This is a matter under investigation and we are fully cooperating with the appropriate authorities. We take this matter very seriously and are conducting our own internal investigation.”

Sources described the Jan. 11 incident in sickening detail.

The patient showed up at Mount Sinai Hospital shortly before 10:30 p.m. complaining of pain in her right shoulder. She was taken to a private room inside the emergency room where nurses gave her two pain pills and a shot for inflammation. Because the woman was still in pain, a nurse administered morphine. The patient was then told to change into a gown for X-rays.

The woman claims she removed her shirt and bra, but kept her pants on. The woman was still dressed in the gown when Newman walked into her room following the X-ray.

“I’m going to give you a shot of morphine,” the doctor told her, according to sources familiar with the woman’s claims.

The patient says she told the doctor that a nurse had already administered the drug, but she then felt a burning sensation in her arm that convinced her that Newman gave her more morphine anyway.

The visit turned creepy when the patient, while the doctor was examining her back, told him she felt pain on the right side of her chest. Newman started fondling her breasts, she alleged, according to sources.

The doctor then moved her bed away from the wall and positioned himself with his back toward the patient. The woman heard the sounds of someone masturbating — and then felt semen on her face, she claimed.

All the while, she was unable to move because she was heavily medicated, sources said.
NYC PAPERS OUT. Social media use restricted to low res file max 184 x 128 pixels and 72 dpi
Anthony DelMundo/New York Daily News
Mount Sinai Hospital has barred Newman, an Iraq War veteran, from seeing patients.

Newman, after allegedly finishing his dirty deed, used a blanket to wipe off the substance from her face. A nurse later came into the room and found the woman in a blacked-out state.

“What is wrong with her? Why is she like this?” the patient heard the nurse ask a staffer, sources said.

The nurse, joined by another physician, Dr. Andrew Jagoda, roused the woman and asked what happened. The patient was drifting in and out of consciousness and unable to respond, she claimed, according to sources.

Once the woman woke up, she walked into the bathroom and spotted what appeared to be semen on her face and bare chest. She told police she wiped it off with a gown, which she then placed in a plastic bag along with the bedding — presumably to preserve as evidence, sources said.

When Jagoda returned to the room a short while later, the patient described what happened and said she wanted to go home. Jagoda asked the woman if she wanted him to call the police. She said she wanted to speak with his supervisor, sources said.

Jagoda then dropped a bombshell — his supervisor was Newman, the doctor she accused of sexual abuse. Horrified, the woman gathered her belongings and left the hospital, sources said.
Getty Images/iStockphoto/Getty Images/iStockphoto
Newman is accused of ejaculating on a 22-year-old patient’s face after incapacitating her with a dose of morphine.

The doctor has published a book called “Hippocrates Shadow: Secrets from the House of Medicine,” in which he lampoons what he sees as a growing disconnect between doctors and their patients.

Newman served as a major in the U.S. Army Reserves. In 2005, he was deployed to Iraq where he received an Army Commendation Medal, according to his author’s note.

Newman, who was the subject of a 2009 medical malpractice suit that was dismissed by a judge, didn’t return requests for comment.

A woman, who spoke through the door at his home in Montclair, N.J., had little to say.

“Sorry,” she said. “Nothing happened.”

With Joseph Stepansky

Monday, January 25, 2016


Source Article:
Does Talmud Teach Bestiality, Pedophilia, Incest?

Pedophilia and Bestiality are seeping into popular culture. Could the Talmud be the source?

Elizabeth Dilling (1894-1966) did more than anyone to expose the true nature of one of Judaism’s holiest books.

By Elizabeth Dilling

(from The Jewish Religion: Its Influence Today, pp. 22-23)

St. Paul, who had been a Pharisee, often bores Christians who do not know what he was arguing about, in his discourses aranguing Pharisees. But one familiar with the Talmud can appreciate his diatribe against the “uncleanness” of those, “Who changed the truth of God into a lie” and: “Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,” until “God gave them over to a reprobate mind … . Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness … .” (Romans 1:22, 25, 28).

Of the “sacred” Talmudic teachings of the “Sages,” preserved since 500 A.D. and taught more widely today than ever before in Talmud-Torah schools in the U.S.A., perhaps nothing better illustrates “fools” with “reprobate minds” than the teaching in the Talmud book of Yebamoth.

Although Moses commanded that if a woman have intercourse with a beast, both should be killed (Leviticus 20:16), and that a priest must not marry a harlot or woman who is profane (Lev. 21:7), the Talmud teaches that “unnatural intercourse does not cause a woman to be forbidden tomarry a High Priest,” since then “you will find no woman eligible … .” (Folios 59a-59b)

Rulings of the “sages” follow: “A woman who had intercourse with a beast is eligible to marry a priest — even a High Priest.” … If she had intercourse with a dog while sweeping the floor, she is likewise reckoned to be pure, and suitable. For, “The result of such intercourse being regarded as a mere wound, and the opinion that does not regard an accidentally injured hymen as a disqualification does not regard such as intercourse either.”

This alone gives a fair idea of the systematic deformation of Scripture by the Pharisees and the truthfulness of Christ’s denunciations about their making God’s commandments of none effect by their Tradition. (Matthew 15:6)


Baby boys may always be used as subjects for sodomy by grown men, according to the Talmud. (The Pharisaic subterfuge here is that until a child reaches sexual maturity, capable of sexual intercourse, he or she does not rank as a person, hence Biblical laws against sodomy (pederasty) do not apply. Throughout the Talmud “nine years and one day” is the fictitious age of male maturity.

Likewise, under “nine years and one day,” the “first stage of intercourse” of a boy with the mother, or any grown woman, is
harmless, Talmudically. Shammai, to seem more “strict,” lowers the age to eight years in some cases. (See Exhibit 82 from Sanhedrin 69b of the Talmud)

A long harangue about the amount of the Kethubah (payment if divorced) a woman gets if her virginity was removed by a young boy, fills Kethuboth I lb of the Talmud. And here, the foul mother may be reckoned “pure,” depending on the age of the child. Such
degrading use of children was typical of paganism throughout the ancient world.

“When a grown up man has intercourse with a little girl it is nothing, for when the girl is less than this – that is, less than three years old — it is as if one puts the finger into the eye — tears come to the eye again and again, so does virginity come back to the little girl under three years.” (See Exhibit 136, Kethuboth 11b of the Talmud)

This is the standard doctrine of the whole Talmud on baby girls. Sodomy and intercourse with babies is the prerogative of the adult Talmudic man, in contrast to Christ’s beautiful teachings concerning little children.

The following is also typical concerning the fictitious age of sexual maturity of baby girls set by the Pharisee “sages:” “A
maiden aged three years and one day may be acquired in marriage by coition …” See Exhibit 55 (Sanhedrin 55b), Exhibit 81
(Sanhedrin 69a-69b), Exhibit 156 (Yebamoth 57b), and Exhibit 159 (Yebamoth 60b); also Niddah 44b…

Adultery is permitted with the wife of a minor, and wife of a non-Jew. (See Exhibit 53) The pretense is that a minor not being a “man” yet, and the non-Jew having non-human status, Talmudically, the Biblical law does not apply.

Thus, once again do the Pharisees make the commandments of God of “none effect” as Christ said. (Matthew 15:6, Mark 7:13)


Moses ordered the priests that: “They shall not take a wife that is a whore, or profane … for he is holy unto his God.” (Leviticus 21:7) The laws against incest are most vehement: “The nakedness of thy mother, shalt thou not uncover: she is thy mother … (Leviticus 18:7) And in the Talmud the Pharisee “sages” reverse these Biblical injunctions:

“If a woman sported lewdly with her young son, a minor and he committed the first stage of cohabitation with her — Beth Shammai say, he thereby renders her unfit to the Priesthood.” Here a footnote explains that she could not marry a priest, if this made her profane and the above Leviticus 21:7 is cited precisely. (See Exhibit 82)

We then learn that the dispute concerns only the age of the son, not the lewdness of the foul mother: “All agree that the connection of a boy aged nine years and one day is a real connection whilst that of one less than eight years is not [Footnote: "So that if he was nine years and a day or more, Beth Hillel agree that she is invalidated from the priesthood, whilst if he was less than eight, Beth Shamnmai agree that she is not."] …


“None of you shall approach to any that is near of kin to him, to uncover their nakedness: I am the Lord,” says the Book (Lev. 18:6). Scripture references are also cited which denounce a married woman who lies “carnally” with a man not her husband. But say the sages: “That in connection with a married woman excludes intercourse with a relaxed membrum since no fertilization can
possibly result. This is a satisfactory interpretation in accordance with the view of him who maintains that if one cohabited with forbidden relatives with relaxed membrum he is exonerated.”

And other Talmud sources are cited. “The exclusion is rather that of intercourse with a dead woman [Footnote 15] even though she died as a married woman.” Thus one is “exonerated” for, or permitted, intercourse with dead relatives or with relatives, married or single, “with a relaxed membrum,” because “no fertilization can possibly result.” (Talmud, Yebamoth 55b, See Exhibit 163)

Intercourse with dead bodies was an old pagan practice. The above is echoed with some variation in “the chief repository of the criminal law of the Talmud,” the book of Sanhedrin. (See Exhibit 89)

There the act of sodomy with one suffering with an incurable disease, hence regarded as already dead, or a “terefah,” is held to be merely “as one who abuses a dead person, and hence exempt.” The explanation, which continues on the next page (not reproduced) is: “Punishment is generally imposed because of the forbidden pleasure derived – [footnote] Whereas there is no sexual gratification in abusing the dead.”

How apt it was when Christ called the Talmudic Pharisees “whited sepulchers … full of all uncleanness.” (Matt. 23) Yet some of His followers call these abominators of every decency “God’s Chosen People” and “People of the Book”!


From my book, Birth Trauma and the Dark Side of Modern Medicine:

"In 1999, the Supreme Court agreed to consider an amicus brief based wholly on Talmudic law... In November 2002, the American Orthodox Jewish community held a kosher dinner in the Supreme Court building to celebrate the establishment of the National Institute for Judaic Law. The dinner was attended by 200 people, including three Supreme Court Justices. The purpose of the Institute is to introduce Talmudic laws into the US legal system and law schools. It is thus the clear civic duty of every American to become intimately acquainted with the Talmud…”

Source Article:
The Case Against Noahide Laws

Original Source: Stop Noahide Law

ED Noor: Americans in their current Islamophobic fervor seem to be terrified of the imposition of Shariah Law upon the nation. They are completely unaware that their nation has already been sold over and that their American legal system has been hijacked by the Talmudics and that their once Napoleonic judicial system has been altered into a truly “jewdicial system”.

"On October 16th [2004], president Bush signed into law the global anti-semitism review act, designed to force the entire world into never being critical of the Jews, whatever their actions.

"This act establishes a special department within the United States state department to monitor global anti-semitism, which is to report annually to congress.

"This act defines a person as being anti-semitic if they purport any of the following beliefs:

~ Any assertion, "that the Jewish community controls government, the media, international business and the financial world."

~ The expression of, "strong anti-Israel sentiment."

~ Expressing, "virulent criticism," of Israel's leaders, past or present. The state department gives an example of this occurring when a swastika is portrayed in a cartoon decrying the behaviour of a past or present Zionist leader.

~ Any criticism of the Jewish religion or its religious leaders or literature with the emphasis on the Talmud and Kabbalah.

~ Any criticism of the United States government and congress for being under undue influence by the Jewish - Zionist community, which would include Jewish organisations such as American-Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC).

~ Any criticism of the Jewish-Zionist community for promoting globalism or what some call the, "New World Order."

~ Placing any blame on Jewish leaders and their followers for inciting the Roman crucifixion of Christ.

~ Citing any facts that could in any way diminish the, "six million," figure of holocaust victims.

~ Claiming that Israel is a racist state.

~ Making any claim that there exists a, "Zionist conspiracy."

~ Offering proof that Jews and their leaders created communism and the bolshevik revolution in Russia.

~ Making, "derogatory statements about Jewish persons."

~ Asserting that spiritually disobedient Jews do not have the biblical right to re-occupy Palestine.

~ Making any allegations of Mossad involvement in the 9/11 attack.

And now, let us get into the nitty gritty of the Noahide Laws, something this blog has been exposing for several years now.

“All Israelites will have a part in the future world. The Goyim, at the end of the world will be handed over to the angel Duma and sent down to hell”. ~ Zohar, Shemoth, Toldoth Noah, Lekh-Lekha .


Public Law 102-14 is an American Federal law which states that the “Seven Noahide Laws” (Jewish Laws from the Talmud) are the principle on which the United States was founded and that it is the responsibility of America to transmit these “ethical values” to future generation both in the United States and the world. But what are these so-called “ethical values” known as the “Seven Noahide Laws” and what implications do they have for non-Jews?


Public Law 102-14 not only states that the Seven Noahide Laws are the principles upon which the American Nation was founded, it also honors Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson of the Lubavitch Movement (also known as Chabad) as being a “great spiritual leader”. According to Rabbi Schneerson, the Noahide Laws are to be kept by force if possible and if not by “pleasantness and peace”. This same Rabbi also stated that non-Jews are inferior to Jews, saying that they have “satanic souls” and their lives are worth nothing except as service to Jews. Why would the USA honor such a Rabbi who preaches the most militant form of Noahide Law and who obviously hates non-Jews?

ED Noor: “It is our duty to force all mankind to accept the seven Noahide laws, and if not ~ they will be killed." ~ Rabbi Yitzhak Ginsburg


After learning about Public Law 102-14 and the Noahide Laws, discriminatory Jewish religious laws which threaten freedom of religion, freedom of speech and sexual expression in the United States and the world, we wanted to learn a little more about modern Jewish opinion on this matter. We are fortunate because in 2008 a book on Noahide Law was published in Jerusalem entitled “The Divine Code”. Better still, the book was reviewed by the Chief Rabbinate of Israel. Let’s see what “The Divine Code” and the Chief Rabbis have to say about Noahide Law.


American Public Law 102-14 enshrines the “Seven Noahide Laws” as the “ethical values” upon which the United States was founded. The law also asserts that it is the nation’s “responsibility” to transmit these “ethical values” to the generations of the future. We read in the 1906 Jewish Encyclopedia that under these laws, those who practice other faiths, blaspheme against Judaism or commit “adultery” are to be punished by death and that non-Jews are commanded to set up “courts of justice” to judge the masses upon these laws. It would also seem that the Chief Rabbis of Israel also support the Noahide Laws being commanded upon non-Jews from their blessings upon the 2008 book “The Divine Code“. But where did these ideas about Noahide Law come from? Noahide Law is not some bizarre aberration of Judaism, it is fundamental and central to Jewish cannon. In which Jewish holy book can we find the Noahide Laws? To answer these questions, we need to learn a little about the most important of all Jewish scriptures, The Babylonian Talmud.


Many American find it hard to believe that congress would pass Public Law 102-14 (The Noahide Laws) if they were truly detrimental to the freedoms of non-Jews. Aren’t most people in congress non-Jewish? Why would they pass a law that was against their own interests? According to former congressman Bill Dannemyer (this is not an endorsement of him), Public Law 102-14 was passed on the vote of only four congressmen, when 99% of congress was absent. If his testimony and the testimony of his wife Dr. Day (again, not an endorsement) are accurate, then 99% of congress never voted on Public Law 102-14. Why was such an important proclamation passed with the consent of only 1% of congress?

ED Noor: By Congressman Dannemyer serving at the time. An excellent read. Basically they passed this using the same conniving methods they utilized when signing the Federal Reserve Act back in 1903.



Ever since the Jewish Talmudic Noahide Laws were introduced into the American legal system back in 1991, some members of the Jewish legal community have been using deceptive practices and outright lies to introduce Jewish Talmudic Laws into the Supreme Court, particularly in the area of capital punishment and execution law. Execution is a legal issue of importance to those seeking to implement Noahide Law in the United States since Noahide Law calls for the decapitation of anyone who practices “idolatry” (which includes Christianity) or blasphemes the Jewish god. Here we will briefly discuss which organizations are infiltrating the Supreme Court, preparing it for the acceptance of Talmudic Law and how they are deceiving the public into accepting Talmudic execution laws (particularly decapitation) in the United States.

ED Noor: Bush Jr. Signing this infamous duplicitous law which had nothing to do with education and everything to do with signing in the Rebbe's dream of establishing the Noahide Laws in America.


The Jews of America and Zionist Israel have not been satisfied with simply enshrining their supremacist, virulent and dangerous Noahide Laws into the United States government via Public Law 102-14. They have been working steadily to further encroach their Talmudic hegemony into the US, and they have won over our Presidents and Supreme Court Justices.

On November 5th, 2002 a Kosher dinner was held at the Supreme Court to celebrate the launch of the International Institute for Judaic Law (IIJL) [currently defunct]. This kosher dinner was attended by three of the Supreme Court Justice, Ruth Bader Ginsberg, Stephen Breyer, and Antonin Scalia, some of whom provided their letters of approval to the founder of the institute, Chabad-Lubavitch Rabbi Dr. Noson Gurary. President George W. Bush also sent his greetings and approval for the institute and Jewish Law.

One of the stated purposes of IIJL was to promote the application of Jewish Law and Philosophy in contemporary society. The Jewish Noahide Laws and Philosophy of the Talmud are inherently biased against non-Jews, promoting their general second-class citizenship and even extermination, so why is the President of the USA and Supreme Court giving credence to such an Jewish supremacist legal system?


When Americans learn about Public Law 102-14 and the Noahide Laws, many are quick to dismiss the threat because “Israel is a secular nation” and would never push for religious laws… how far this is from the truth!

Today, Jews and their supporters drum the misconception that Israel is a “secular sate”. Israel is a “Jewish sate”, a Zionist state, a religious state and this is very obvious from Israel’s legal system. The nation of Israel has no constitution, on purpose, because this would force the nation to choose between “secularism” and halacha (Jewish Law). Israel does however have state appointed and funded Rabbis and Rabbinical Courts. The Rabbis of Israel have gained control of and have implemented religious law in the sectors of marriage, divorce and adoption and are seeking to develop greater influence over the nation’s military and education sectors. A nation which does not have a constitution of secularism but does have state religious figures with legal powers is not a “secular state”; it is a pseudo-theocracy at best. Surprisingly, recent polls have suggested that support for Halacha law over democracy is very high within the nation of Israel.


When criticizing the international Jewish legal system known as Noahide Law (Public Law 102-14 in America), one is often accused of being “anti-Semitic”. To call someone an “anti-Semite” implies they have issues with “Semitic” people, and thus you are equating them with being something akin to a racist. It can be stated that Noahide Law is just that, a law, and so opposing this law is no less “racist” than opposing Islamic Sharia law or Communism. A legal text is not a group or people, it is not an ethnicity, and it is not a race, so to oppose it cannot be “anti-Semitic”. However, there is a deeper question that needs to be answered here, are Jew’s really a race or ethnicity? When we look at modern laws in Israel, Jewish theology, and claims by modern Jewish geneticists, we can see that Judaism has been conflated with “Semitism”, they are not the same thing.

Criticism of Noahide Law and Judaism in general has nothing to do with hatred for any race or ethnicity, it has to do with opposing deleterious ideology, nothing more, nothing less.


When many Christian learn about Noahide Law and the Talmud, they wrongly believe that the injunctions against “heathens” do not apply to them. Little do Christians know that according to Jewish Law, to be Christian is worse than being a “heathen” since Christians are considered “heretics” and “apostates”. Indeed, according to the Talmud, becoming Christian is one of the worst sins one can commit, and Jesus himself is harshly admonished for being a sorcerer, blasphemer and a whore monger.

ED Noor: The seven Noahide laws, as traditionally enumerated are:

Do Not Deny God
Do Not Blaspheme God
Do Not Murder
Do Not Engage in Incestuous, Adulterous or Homosexual Relationships
Do Not Steal
Do Not Eat of a Live Animal
Establish Courts/Legal System to Ensure Law Obedience

Should the LGBTQ community be worried about Public Law 102-14 and the Jewish Noahide Laws? Absolutely. According to traditional interpretations of Noahide Law, the law against “adultery” includes homosexuality, and like adulterers, homosexuals would be killed under Noahide Law. The Talmud is full of commands to kill homosexuals, classing them with persons who have sex with animals.

Non-Jews accused of homosexuality could be executed at any time in a Noahide court upon the testimony of one witness and upon the verdict of just one judge; Jews on the other hand would need two witnesses to their “crime” of homosexuality and could not be executed unless they were brought before a panel of 71 judges (the Sanhedrin). Further, some Rabbis of the Talmud make prejudicial assumptions, stating that Jews are generally not thought to practice homosexuality, thus providing Jews with a biased favor before the court. Talmudic Law obviously has an inherent bias against non-Jews who have been accused of this so-called “sin” and non-Jewish LGBTQs are obviously in greater danger of persecution under Noahide Law than Jewish LGBTQs.


Adultery is a “crime” under Jewish Noahide Law, one for which non-Jews are to be decapitated. But what is the Jewish definition of adultery? Many might be surprised to learn that under usual circumstance, only a woman can be accused of adultery under Jewish Law, while Jewish men are free to engage in extramarital sex and keep sex slaves, even having sex with non-Jewish infants as young as three years old.

Meanwhile, woman only accused of adultery were stripped naked and put on public display during the Talmudic times. Are these the type of “morals” we want in the USA (Public Law 102-14) or around the world? While many will point to the fact that such practices are not taking place today, according to Halachic material, this is only because current Israeli society has been corrupted by foreign influence (as during Roman times), something that Noahide advocates are working to correct.


One of the Seven Noahide Laws is “do not murder”; who could disagree with that? Well, it depends on your definition of murder. According to the Jewish Law of the Talmud, there is no penalty for killing a person indirectly, thus Jewish law provides provisions for killing others (even other Jews) via starvation, exposure, suffocation, and more. But, this principle only applies to Jews. Non-Jews who commit these same crimes are sentenced to death. Noahide Law (Public Law 102-14) is inherently biased in favor of Jews, and resembles nothing close to what would be considered common morality or ethics.

ED Noor: Read about The King's Torah, a modern Israeli publication by several prominent rabbis.



One of the Seven Noahide Laws from the Jewish Talmud is “Do Not Steal”. That sounds pretty reasonable right? But did you know that according to the Talmud Jews are given full permission to steal from non-Jews? And don’t forget, Jews are not prosecuted for stealing small amounts of money, but non-Jews are.

Members of the modern Sanhedrin in Israel.


The seventh and final law of the Seven Noahide Laws (Public Law 102-14) is to “appoint courts of justice”. But what kind of American courts would uphold Jewish law? According to the reputable Jewish legal source, the Mishneh Torah (aka Rambam) written by the famous Jewish scholar Maimonides, non-Jews are to set up “theocratic courts” whose judges are learned in “Torah” and who do no “pervert” the law with secular logic.

Non-Jews who fail to set up theocratic Jewish courts in their nations are subjected to mass execution. If this were not enough, it may (or may not) be required for non-Jews to appoint theocratic kings among themselves who will ensure that the nation is upholding Noahide Law. The United States was founded upon the principle of separation of Church and State, so what is such a law as Public Law 102-14 doing in our federal legal system?


The very first of The Seven Jewish Noahide Laws (American Public Law 102-14) is “No Idolatry”. Well most people don’t bow before graven images, so does it really matter if such practices are outlawed? “Idolatry” under Jewish Noahide Law encompasses much much more than simply banning people from bowing before statues.

According to Jewish legal scholars, to avoid “idolatry”, one must:

~ accept Jewish Torah;

~ accept Jewish prophets and teachers;

~ and give obedience to Jewish courts.

~ Also, one must not accept non-Jewish scriptures;

~ not follow non-Jewish prophets or priests.

All non-Jewish religious temples and paraphernalia are to be destroyed and any attempts to proselytize a non-Jewish religion will lead to execution. In addition, under the Noahide Law which abolishes “idolatry”, non-Jews can be executed for doing something as simple as consulting astrologers or getting a tattoo. Finally, non-Jews are commanded to not love those who practice idolatry and to even hate them.

ED Noor: "MAY" have racist UNDERtones!? See images above.

Public Law 102-14 in the United States and the Jewish Noahide Laws are of concern to all non-Jews. The Noahide Laws are rules created by Jews for non-Jews, and these rules relegate us to a 2nd class status. But there are layers to this 2nd class citizenship for non-Jews under Jewish Talmudic law.

Did you know that according to the Talmud, the same book which gives us the Noahide Laws, that African people are considered to be cursed? That’s right, according to the Talmud the “negro” race was produced through a curse on Noah’s son Ham. Since it is the Talmud which informs Noahide Law in general, and it is from Jewish Talmudists that we are informed on the laws, it is certainly possible that some of this Talmudic racism could bleed through, infecting the already nefarious Noahide Laws with a new layer of hate, anti-African racism. Anti-African racism in Israel might be a good indicator for the temper in which Rabbis might promote the Noahide Law among non-Jews.


When speaking about Noahide Law with either Jews or Noahides, sometimes a person who is either misinformed or even willingly trying to deceive you will proclaim that there is no reason to worry about Noahide Law since according to Jewish theology, no “Ger Toshav” can be accepted at this time. According to Jewish Law, a “Ger Toshav” can only be accepted during a time when the nation of Israel has instated a holiday called the Jubilee, and the modern nation of Israel has not done this. However, this logic is deceptive, since the speaker is either accidentally or intentionally conflating a “Noahide” with a “Ger Toshav”, they are not the same thing!









“Happy will be the lost of Israel, whom the Holy One, blessed be He, has chosen from amongst the Goyim, of whom the Scriptures say: ”Their work is but vanity, it is an illusion at which we must laugh, they will all perish when God visits them in His wrath.’ At the moment when the Holy One, blessed be He, will exterminate all the Goyim of the world, Israel alone will subsist, even as it is written: ‘‘The Lord alone will appear great on that day! …’” ~ Zohar, Vayshlah 177b

“It is the law to kill anyone who denies the Torah. The Christians belong to the denying ones of the Torah.” ~ Coschen hamischpat 425 Hagah 425. 5

“Although the non-Jew has the same body structure as the Jew, they compare with the Jew like a monkey to a human.” ~ Schene luchoth haberith, p. 250 b

Rosh Hashanah 17a. Christians (minnim) and others who reject the Talmud will go to hell and be punished there for all generations.

Minor Tractates. Soferim 15, Rule 10. This is the saying of Rabbi Simon ben Yohai: Tob shebe goyyim harog ~“Even the best of the gentiles should all be killed”.

Sunday, January 24, 2016


Seeing a baby suffer like this just hurts my heart. When will Mankind see that we have taken the wrong path? Obviously, these birth defects are being caused by some kind of poisoning!!! Whether it's mothers eating genetically modified foods and/or radioactive fish from the Pacific Ocean, getting vaccinated, taking pharmaceutical drugs (especially anti-depressants and "fertility" drugs), using hair and skin care products that are full of toxic chemicals, drinking fluoridated, chlorinated water, breathing in highly toxic air from chemtrails and all the shit they spray in their own homes including hair spray, perfume, "air fresheners" and more, being exposed to pesticides in their food and around their home, being exposed to wifi radiation - including holding cell phones right on top of their pregnant belly, having their babies exposed to ultrasound technology which changes the genetics of the child, etc. Researchers are stumped because they're a bunch of mindless morons. The reason for the increasing birth defects is obvious. WE ARE BEING POISONED!!!

Source Article:
Babies born with organs outside their bodies up by a third

Researchers are unsure why cases of the rare condition have increased in frequency so much during the last two decades.

ATLANTA, Jan. 22 (UPI) -- The number of babies born with organs protruding from their bodies has risen significantly in the last 20 years, and most dramatically in non-Hispanic black mothers under 20, but researchers at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention say they are not sure of the cause.

Instances of gastroschisis -- a birth defect in the abdominal wall causing intestines or other organs to protrude from the body -- doubled in the United States between 1995 and 2012, according to a new CDC report.

About 2,000 babies are born with the defect each year. The cause of the defect is unknown, but researchers in the 1970s linked young maternal age with gastroschisis.

"It concerns us that we don't know why more babies are being born with this serious birth defect," said Dr. Coleen Boyle, director of the National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, in a press release. "Public health research is urgently needed to figure out the cause and why certain women are at higher risk of having a baby born with gastroschisis."

According to the CDC's Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, researchers at the agency requested birth data for the years 2006 through 2012 from 14 states that had been used to analyze rates of the defect from 1995 to 2005 in a previous report. When researchers pooled data from 1995 to 2012, it covered about 29 percent of births in the United States for those years.

Overall, the number of cases increased during the 20-year period by 30 percent, from 3.6 per 10,000 births between 1995 and 2005 to 4.9 per 10,000 births between 2006 and 2012. All categories of age and race or ethnicity saw increases in incidence, ranging from a 68 percent increase in white mothers under age 20 to 263 percent in black mothers under 20.

The researchers said the increase is not related to births for teen mothers because, during the same 20 years, the number of teen mothers decreased.

"Gastroschisis is unusual among birth defects in that it disproportionately affects younger mothers, a vulnerable population," reseachers wrote in the report. "The continued increase in age-adjusted prevalence and the pace of the increase suggests that unidentified risk factors might be contributing. Identification of these risk factors is needed to inform public health interventions and reduce prevalence."

Saturday, January 23, 2016


All of the sexualization you are about to see is the result of the Luciferian Jew influence in our society and their control of the media. The media are being used to influence the minds of young children in the direction of Luciferianism and pedophilia. It is time to hold those responsible for this filth accountable.


The Hypersexualization of Children by the media Exposed

If you have young children or grand children.. You REALLY need to see this.. If you can watch this and not believe its true, your're a mentally damaged idiot!.. This is what's really going on and everyone should realize it!.. it's about the Hypersexualization of young kids... This is very important for every parent and grand parent of young children to know!.. It's being done by mediaand Toy manufacturers.. Parents have little control of it!..38 mins. long, Definitely worth watching...Thanks to Geena Davis..No copyright infringement intended...If Zombies were real, Walt Disney woulda' popped up and killed these fukers'

Posted by Cary Smith on Thursday, January 21, 2016

If you have young children or grand children.. You REALLY need to see this.. If you can watch this and not believe its true, you're a mentally damaged idiot!.. This is what's really going on and everyone should realize it!.. it's about the Hypersexualization of young kids... This is very important for every parent and grand parent of young children to know!.. It's being done by media and Toy manufacturers.. Parents have little control of it!..38 mins. long, Definitely worth watching...Thanks to Geena Davis..No copyright infringement intended...If Zombies were real, Walt Disney woulda popped up and killed these fuckers

Thursday, January 14, 2016


It appears that those who control the media (Luciferian Jews) are trying to bury this story and make it completely nonaccessible. Several different sites have attempted to share this story and all of them are currently not available!!! Censorship is OVER-THE-TOP!!

Luciferian Jews are behind all of this evil. They are controlling Germany. They are behind the sexualization of children. They control the pornography industry and have brought us every sexual perversion imaginable. Their satanic "holy" book (the Talmud) tells them it is OK to have sex with 3-year-olds. If non-Jews do not step up and stop this evil cult, the children of our world are in great danger. Please wake up and share this story widely. This madness has got to stop.

Source article:
Germany and EU to Legalize Pedophilia and with it, Child Pornography as well!

Booklets from a subsidiary of the German government’s Ministry for Family Affairs encourage parents to sexually massage their children as young as 1 to 3 years of age. Two 40-page booklets entitled “Love, Body and Playing Doctor” by the German Federal Health Education Center (Bundeszentrale für gesundheitliche Aufklärung – BZgA) are aimed at parents – the first addressing children from 1-3 and the other children from 4-6 years of age.

“Fathers do not devote enough attention to the clitoris and vagina of their daughters. Their caresses too seldom pertain to these regions, while this is the only way the girls can develop a sense of pride in their sex,” reads the booklet regarding 1-3 year olds. The authors rationalize, “The child touches all parts of their father’s body, sometimes arousing him. The father should do the same.”

Why do some people still vote for these scumbags? Next time we must all vote our local NATIONALIST (extreme right) Political Party to restore normality.

Canadian author and public speaker Michael O’Brien who has written and spoken extensively about the crisis of culture in the West spoke to about the shocking and extremely disturbing phenomenon. It is, he said, “State-encouraged incest, which in most civilized societies is a crime.” The development is, he suggests, a natural outcome of the rejection of the Judeo-Christian moral order.

“The imposed social revolution that has swept the western world is moving to a new stage as it works out the logical consequences of its view of man’s value,” said O’Brien. “It is merely obeying its strictly materialist philosophy of man. If man is no more than a creature created for pleasure or power. If he is no more than a cell in the social organism, then no moral standards, no psychological truths, no spiritual truths can refute the ‘will to power’ and the ‘will to pleasure’.”

The pamphlet advises parents to permit young children “unlimited masturbation” except where physical injury becomes apparent. It advises: “Children should learn that there is no such thing as shameful parts of the body. The body is a home, which you should be proud of.” For ages 4-6, the booklet recommends teaching children the movements of copulation.

Another product of the BZgA is a song book aimed at children of four and slightly older which includes several songs espousing masturbation. The song-book entitled “Nose, belly and bum” includes one song with the following lyrics: “When I touch my body, I discover what I have. I have a vagina, because I am a girl. Vagina is not only for peeing. When I touch it, I feel a pleasant tingle.”

“The wiser and deeper position of most civilizations recognized that children need a period of innocence,” commented O’Brien. “Now the state, the German state, is encouraging destruction of this state of innocence,” he added. “This is consistent with the materialist philosophy that sees all moral norms and all truths about human nature as repressive. Pleasure and their distorted concept of freedom are their only guiding principles.”

According to the Polish daily newspaper Rzeczpospolita, the BZgA booklet is an obligatory read in nine German regions. It is used for training nursery, kindergarten and elementary school teachers. Ironically it is recommended by many organizations officially fighting pedophilia, such as the German Kunderschutzbund. BZgA sends out millions of copies of the booklet every year.

“A society such as Germany’s which is already in steep decline, indeed into degeneration, will only inherit the whirlwind of violence and further levels of degradation of their own people,” warned O’Brien.

“It has happened before in Germany. It has happened in other nations. Different causes but the same dynamic, the rejection of the moral order of the created universe results in radical evil. The German state intervention in family life is a new level of auto-destruction,” said O’Brien.

Rzeczpospolita reports that the Eckhardt Scheffer of BZgA claimed that before releasing the manual the organization consulted parents, educators and child psychologists. 93% of whom gave a positive evaluation.

Even for a Western nation, Germany’s billboards and television ads push the limits of public pornography. Last year reported that a very popular teen magazine in Germany publishes nude photos of teens in sexual positions which would be in almost any other nation illegal child pornography.

With a licentiousness as the new morality of the secular materialist establishment and homeschool a forbidden practice, parents in Germany may well wonder what will transpire in public education.

“Will those children who are not liberated by their parents have special classes in their schools where they’re introduced to these practices,” asked O’Brien rhetorically. “If the state intervenes in this way, what won’t it intervene in?”

O’Brien concluded his comments quoting G.K. Chesterton: “When men cease to believe in God, they do not thereafter believe in nothing, they then become capable of believing anything.”

To express concerns to German authorities:

In Canada:

German Embassy
1 Waverley Street
Ottawa, ON, K2P 0T8
Tel.: 613-232-1101 Fax: 613-594-9330

In the US:

German Embassy
4645 Reservoir Road NW
Washington, DC, 20007-1998
(202) 298-4000
The embassy can be e-mailed from its website:

To express concerns to German authorities:

President of the Federal Republic of Germany
11010 Berlin
Telefon: +49 30 20 00-0
Fax: +49 030 20 00-19 99

Angela Merkel
Willy-Brandt-Straße 1
10557 Berlin
Telefon: +49 180 272-0000
Fax: +49 1888 272-2555


Tuesday, January 12, 2016


This is one of the better films I've seen that exposes the bold-faces lies we have been told about the so-called Jewish holocaust -- lies that have been shoved down our throats from the time we are children until this very day. People have spent time in jail for trying to expose these filthy liars, but because the liars control the legal system, the schools, and the all the world's media, they have had a monopoly on the minds of the good people in our world. No more. Now is the time for The Truth to be made known and I am visioning an AVALANCHE OF TRUTH coming forward right now that not only exposes the lies and the liars, but enables Mankind to deal with these vermin effectively. Enough is enough. We can remain silent no more. Please share.

6,000,000 LIE$! - Part I

6,000,000 LIE$! - Part II

6,000,000 LIE$! - Part III

6,000,000 LIE$! - Part IV

6,000,000 LIE$! - Part V

6,000,000 LIE$! - Part VI

6,000,000 LIE$! - VII

6,000,000 LIE$! - Part VIII

6,000,000 LIE$! - IX

Tuesday, January 5, 2016


"Oooooh ripping, crushing, and cutting your son's penis is part of your BELIEFS?! OH, well then, please by all means.... Continue! We wouldn't want to OFFEND YOU!

Wait is that a clamp on your son's penis? OH, it's a family tradition? Well then in that case, carry on!

Is that mohel sucking your son's bloody penis? OH, it's your RELIGION? Well why didn't you say so?! That makes it PERFECTLY ACCEPTABLE!!



See for yourself:


Thanks to #Bloodstained Men and their Friends

Thursday, December 31, 2015


Source Article:
The Devil Has A Name: Who’s Behind Miley Cyrus’ Antics?

In a February 2011 interview with GQ , the mostly forgotten Billy Ray Cyrus spoke in depth on the downward spiral of his daughter Miley. While no stranger to whoring for fame, Billy Ray’s fatherly anguish was intense and palpable. But instead of identifying the flesh and blood featherless bipeds who had abducted his daughter and turned her into the locus for the celebration of indignity and sickness, Billy Ray’s Achy Breaky Heart sought supernatural explanations, likely due to his patented synthesis of stupidity and pissantery:

GQ: Do you really see it in such clearly spiritual terms—that your family was under attack by Satan?

BRC: I think we are right now. No doubt. There’s no doubt about it.

GQ: And why is that happening?

BRC: It’s the way it is. There has always been a battle between good and evil. Always will be. You think, ‘This is a chance to make family entertainment, bring families together…” And look what it’s turned into.

These statements contradict what he told the press around the same time as the GQ interview; which was comparatively blunt:

“I’m scared for her. She’s got a lot of people around her that’s putting her in a great deal of danger.”

Obviously, Billy Ray did not have the character to stand up like a man and fight for his daughter’s well-being and honor against these “dangerous people”. After all, Mr. Hannah Montana didn’t want to burn any bridges to the devil, and three years later he managed to renew his “faustian pact” with a grotesquely pornographic, miscegenation-ridden, rap-infused catastrophic failure of a sequel (54,027 thumbs down on youtube vs 21,651 thumbs up) to his simple and innocent 1992 country hit:

Hannah Montana “Grows Up”

Annie Leibovitz’s sexualized portrayal of 15 year old Miley Cyrus in a 2008 release of Vanity Fair.

The Disney name, for reasons that defy common sense, evokes trust in parents who see fit to allow the television to raise their children. While it’s the Jew Bob Iger aggressively politicizing Mickey’s ears from behind the scenes, it is cloaked beneath the artistic, volkish, beautiful vision built from scratch by German-American founder and “anti-Semitic” clairvoyant Walt.

From circa 2006 to 2011, millions of families throughout our globalized world gathered in front of the Jude-tube to watch the teenage tribute to materialism, feminism, and ugly careerism known as Hannah Montana. The family the show follows is a crude stereotype of the “country bumpkin” Billy Ray worked hard to cultivate and transform into a profitable niche, but in spite of all the passive propaganda (including Miley Cyrus herself claiming it was patterned after Sex in the City, minus the sex), the show was mostly free of pornography, gore, and suggestiveness–a rare find for parents in the 21st century.

This, however, was not always consistent, as Miley Cyrus’ increasingly exhibited family “unfriendly” behavior off the screen. 2008 can be pinpointed as the beginning of Cyrus’ descent into madness, when the Jewish fuzz-bumper Annie Leibovitz–the “Leonardo Da Vinci” of the modern world who you might know from her latest [in]famous portrayal of Judeo-America’s Mona Lisa, “Caitlyn Jenner,” as well as a greater portfolio featuring other trashy, anti-white, aesthetically repugnant takes on mentally ill, talentless, morally bankrupt scumbags made aristocrats by the Judeo-capitalists. Leibovitz and Vanity Fair aggressively pursued America’s folksy sweetheart to be featured in a sexually charged photoshoot.

By 2008, the Hannah Montana franchise was already valued at a whooping $1 billion dollars, and the people supplying this money were the splurging parents of kids between toddler and tween. For good reason, the Jews of Disney scrambled for public relations control when the topless photos of the underage sitcom star encountered great social controversy, a Disney Channel statement released in its wake read:

“Unfortunately, as the article suggests, a situation was created to deliberately manipulate a 15-year-old in order to sell magazines”

“Nobody says no to Annie” is the mantra of the show business world in respects to Leibovitz. Bolstered by an intricate network known as the Jewish media, Billy Ray’s devil, whose camera is wielded as a racial mallet against the foundations of Western civilization (self-restraint, beauty, moderation in sex and vice), has been granted the power to immortalize. Most 15 year old girls, without strong and keen fathers to protect them, would find the premise of defying the standard child-star trajectory and being recorded in history forever to be very appealing. Most 15 year old girls, additionally, want to act like grown ups, and what’s more “grown up” in the Jewish saboteurs infantilization of our culture than sexual provocation and making your own pornography?

2013: The Devil Makes Her Twerk

L: Britney Spears before working with the Jew Larry Rudolph; R: After

The Annie Liebovitz controversy was an important signal to the Jewish establishment regarding the lack of responsible supervision over Miley Cyrus, and her potential as a vehicle for aggression in their war against mankind. When Hannah Montana came to an end, and Cyrus’ music career began to wane, she signed with the Jew manager Larry Rudolph, and her behavior has gotten more bizarre and viscerally offensive ever since.

Rudolph has specialized in “rejuvenating” the careers of child stars. The sleazy Ashkenazi pimp, in fact, has been credited with the short-lived pop fad of Cyrus’ fellow ex-Disney channel star Britney Spears, who at barely 16 years of age premiered in the 1999 Baby One More Time , where the Jew Nigel Dick collaborated closely with Rudolph to feature the teenage girl gyrating invitingly in pig tails and an erotically tailored catholic school uniform begging men to “hit her” (the song itself was written and produced by almost certain Jew Martin Sandberg aka “Max Martin”, and was played on loop on MTV and the radio until it grew on America’s young shiksas).

The media masters, it appears, get people like Spears and Cyrus into your living room by introducing them as sweet and innocent kids, then once children start looking at them as role models, suddenly “grow them up”. We all know how Spears ended up, and she was eventually retired after a very public and humiliating psychological break down–it is this, not just profits, that Jews seek for the masses.

Fast forward to 2013, and Rudolph found himself sucking on the neck of a new host. Cyrus’ obscene “twerking” (a dance meant to simulate sex, commonly practiced by negroes) performance at the Video Music Awards won her jeers and made people start asking questions about her mental state. But Jew Rudolph commented that it “could not have gone better“. Rudolph, a flesh and blood man and certainly not a supernatural entity, has been singled out as the main conduit for Cyrus’ demeaning behavior:

“One day she was a sweet smiling Disney darling, and the next she was a sexually-aggressive, body baring songstress intent on twerking and tonguing her way to the top of the charts.

How did this happen?

Well for one, she hired Britney Spears’ manager, Larry Rudolph.

In March, Cyrus signed up with Rudolph, the man best known for guiding the career of Britney Spears from Mouseketeer to pop singing sex symbol.”

Miley Cyrus “twerking” at the 2013 VMAs

With Rudolph at the helm, Cyrus was trained by his people in the art of cultural decline. Millions of impressionable young girls who had followed Cyrus since her Hannah Montana days were subjected to something alien, crude, undignified, and primitive. Unsurprisingly, Cyrus’ “twerking” act was not a lapse in judgment, but in fact, meticulously choreographed by what Esquire Magazine describes as a “hip young Jewish woman from Brooklyn” named Diane Martel.

Reactions to Miley Cyrus performing a public sex act with subhuman ecstacy, where her tongue was fully out of her mouth the entire time she was being dry humped in front of millions, were largely negative. Even outraged blacks, accustomed to seeing such behavior, like “Charlamagne Tha God”, said: “Why you wanna be on this nigga side so bad? I’m trying to cross over.

extrapolates in between the lines on the political agenda behind the performance:

“Miley’s application for a hood pass and desire to “corrupt” a nation full of young, white girls to back that thing up has many folks scratching their heads.”

The Jew Martel is no stranger to “tha game”, she experimented first on American negroes without their knowledge by creating the “look and feel of hip-hop’s cultural iconography in the 90s”, and was behind many famous videos that established the “urban aesthetic” of rappers like Wu-Tang Clan, Redman, and Mary J. Blige.

Esquire continues:

“Martel invented Miley’s street cred by reconstructing the manic claustrophobia of Wu-Tang’s late, great ODB, and transporting it to the mansion-sized, Laurel Canyon circle-twerk bacchanal of Cyrus’s “We Can’t Stop”.

Diane Martel was also the architect behind Miley Cyrus’s 2013 VMA performance.”

The twerking episode was one of many subsequent nasties, but nothing beats the devil’s latest lewd contribution, undoubtedly consented to not by Miley, but the drugs she has been plied with for years.

Her Latest Outrage: A Sexualized Infant

Many people have commented on the contemporary push for normalizing child molestation, whether it’s the infamous “op ed” from Jew-infested Salon’s in-house pedophile done under the guise of “tolerance”, or the New York Times Jew Margo Kaplan’s “Pedophilia: A Disorder, Not a Crime” under the thin veneer of science, Jew Louis CK talking about screwing kids shielded by comedy, or mentally ill Yid laughing stock Shia Labeouf in clothes meant to make him look naked putting his face in the crotch of a prepubescent girl done under the cover of “performance art”. Anglo-Saxon semantics-culture is the easiest rubik’s cube the Talmudically trained debaters have ever beaten.

But Miley’s latest music video feels the climate is comfortable enough to not come up with an alibi. The video features Cyrus in a diaper and bonnet opening her legs up to the camera, rolling her tongue all over a pacifier to the lyrics:

I don’t really want an older you
I heard I change my mind with you often
Baby talk is creeping me out
Fuck me so you stop baby talking

By 3:52, Cyrus is in a baby’s crib, wearing an outfit that hardly even hides her fork, while moving in the cow girl position mouthing the hook “Fuck Me, stop baby talking”.

Tracing this video’s origins, we find the same Jews Jewing about. MTV reports Diane Martel, described as much “talked-about”, as the director of the video. What’s the damn point? Despite her large, established, female die-hard fanbase that has stuck by her since Hannah Montana, Miley’s video has 180,000 youtube disapprovals (and growing) and a pyrrhic positive rating of almost 192,000. Hardly smart to split your audience like that by portraying something so viscerally and pointlessly offensive if profit’s your only motive. No amount of rationalization can take away what everyone can plainly see this video is edging society towards.

Outside of the general evil of pedophilia, the purpose of bringing this insanity into the mainstream is to sow distrust between adults and children. Paradoxically, in cultures where homosexuality is supposedly accepted and the sexual revolution is rife (America, Sweden, Germany), a purely platonic hug between two men will be (understandably) feared and construed as a potential queer come-on, while in Iran where fags are put to death two men or two women have no qualms walking down the street hand in hand without sexual insinuations.

Our world is so “Pozzed” that men on certain airlines are forced to undergo the embarrassment of changing seats when placed next to minors on airplanes, under the assumption that all adult males are child-molesters. Jews have a vested interest in eroding non-sexual intimacy and friendship among Gentiles and whites, as this is how mammals establish trust, which then turns to social capital, and finally to revolution.

Imagine if pedophilia becomes normalized against the people’s will, like “gay marriage” was. No parent will ever be able to share a bed or hug their own children ever again. You won’t be able to have your grandchildren on your lap, or tickle your nieces or nephews without suspicion, or at the very least, people having the depressing thought in the back of their minds. If you think the world is ugly today, it will only get worse unless we get together politically.

It’s impossible to know for sure, but Miley Cyrus’ career evolution was probably planned from the start of Hannah Montana. Imagine being the parent of a 5 year old girl who idolized the tender small town character of 2007 and then being in the awkward spot of forbidding her today from going to gratuitous tributes and promotions of animal behavior, pedophilia, drug use, immaturity, race-mixing, and who knows what else at a contemporary Cyrus performance.

Some people call him devil, others call him “liberal”, even more refer to him as “dangerous people”. But I won’t mince words: his name is Jew. And if we don’t exorcise him out of our country, the gangrenous sore will continue to grow.