Wednesday, March 4, 2015

ABORTED BABIES HARVESTED TO GROW KIDNEY ORGANS IN RATS FOR TRANSPLANTATION INTO HUMANS



Source Article:
No longer science fiction: Aborted human fetuses harvested to grow kidney organs in rats for transplantation into human patients
http://www.naturalnews.com/048411_organ_harvesting_aborted_babies_biotech_medicine.html


(NaturalNews) Human fetal kidneys harvested from aborted babies are being surgically implanted into adult rats to grow new kidneys to be transplanted into awaiting human adults.

This procedure, which is under rapid development, is being framed as a medical breakthrough by scientists who appear to be completely blind to the moral and ethical issues at stake in such a scheme.

"[This] is definitely the first time an actual whole human organ has been grown in an animal, and has sustained the life of that animal," explains Eugene Gu, the founder and CEO of Ganogen, Inc. in Redwood, Calif. "Our long-term goal is to grow human organs in animals, to end the human donor shortage." [1]

LiveScience.com reports, "The research shows that it is feasible to remove a kidney from an aborted human fetus, and implant the organ into a rat, where the kidney can grow to a larger size."

From the Ganogen.com website:



Study results have been published in the Jan. 22 issue of the American Journal of Transplantation.

The ethics question

To its credit, Live Science directly addresses the moral issues surrounding this technology, even offering quotes from a bioethicist who says the practice won't be tolerated. As reported on the website:

Arthur Caplan, a bioethicist at NYU Langone Medical Center, said the study itself did not concern him. However, "there is no way we're ever going to use fetal human kidneys or any other solid organs for transplant," Caplan said. "American society is morally uncomfortable enough about abortion that growing organs from fetal remains will never be accepted, and will be banned in state after state."

The researchers said they hope Caplan is wrong...



The Ganogen.com website does not appear to contain any ethics statement defining any limitations on how the developed technology might be used. It appears to company has likely not considered the ethical implications of its research. While there's no doubt the founders of the company have entered this realm with the best of intentions, they appear to be young, brilliant and naive, wholly unaware of what the roads to Hell are paved with.

Here's a picture, also from the Ganogen.com website, showing some of the organs they've managed to grow from kidney tissue harvested from aborted human babies:



Abortion farms and organ factories

Western medicine today is dominated by the attitude of "heroic interventionism" lead by "medical mechanics" who celebrate each other's abilities to grow, harvest and transplant organs across an ever-expanding list of animal and human subjects.

But just because you can achieve such transplantation results doesn't mean you should. In the same way, yes you can genetically engineer food crops to combine insect genes with plant genes and release them into the wild, but it's probably not very wise to do so due to the very real possibility of self-replicating genetic pollution.

What happens if this new fetal tissue organ harvesting procedure becomes so successful that millions of customers line up to buy the new organs? You'd very quickly see for-profit medical corporations setting up fetal abortion farms to harvest their organs for the "organ factory."



Young women would be paid (or kidnapped) to get pregnant and have their unborn babies harvested for the organ tissue. Actually, this step is practically happening today as companies like Stem Express in Placerville, California, already sell aborted human fetal tissue for "medical research."

In Nigeria, a baby farm was already in operation where teenage girls were kidnapped and forced to be impregnated against their will, only to give birth and have their children stolen away for human trafficking profits. "Thirty-two pregnant girls were rescued from a maternity home run by a trafficking ring in the southern city of Aba," reports The Guardian. [2] "The girls, mostly of school age, were allegedly locked up at the Cross Foundation clinic so they could produce babies to be sold for illegal adoption or for use in ritual witchcraft."

U.S. corporations could then purchase the harvested aborted fetal tissue from such "baby factories" being run in other countries, then they'd bring the fetal tissue to U.S. facilities where large numbers of rats (which are mammals) are subjected to the torturous procedure of having their bodies cut open and implanted with the harvested human fetal organ cells in order to grow human kidneys.

Once the kidneys grow to a suitable size, the rats would obviously be killed to harvest those organs, which would then be transported to hospitals to be surgically transplanted into humans for profit. The mainstream media would dutifully celebrate the "lifesaving medical breakthrough" and describe the mad scientists as heroes for humanity.



The medical Matrix: turning a human baby into a profit center for medical corporations

If there's money to be made from harvesting the organs of aborted babies, make no mistake that there are corporations more than willing to profit from the blood money.

Even today, western medicine does not consider a human baby to be "alive" until after it is born... even though an unborn child shows every sign of life that would normally be considered "alive" in a rigorous scientific context. The unborn baby shows a heartbeat, brain activity, cellular growth, nutrient metabolism, waste elimination, muscular movement and even demonstrates emotions and reactions to stimuli. Clearly an unborn baby is alive. This not deniable except by those who are intentionally dishonest.

But thanks to a medical system that can abandon all ethics and declare an unborn baby to be something less than a living human being, there's nothing stopping biotechnology corporations from harvesting aborted human babies for profit.

And because there's no moral boundary against doing this with one baby, there's also no moral boundary against doing this with millions of babies in an "abortion farm" organ harvesting operation carried by a public company with its own stock symbol on Wall Street. Who knows, maybe your favorite retirement mutual fund will buy some shares, too, because all that matters are the earnings per share, right?

Here's a picture of a modern-day chicken meat factory. Replace the chickens with human babies and you begin to get an idea of the future where medical science operates without human ethics:



Watch The Island movie for a preview of how this might play out

In the sci-fi movie The Island, starring Ewan McGregor, the world's wealthy elite pay a biotech corporation to raise human clones in a medical facility as "living organ banks." Those human clones are later killed to have their organs harvested for transplantation into the paying customer.

Much like in our own world today, the clones are controlled through a system of total media propaganda. Regular media broadcasts remind the clones that it's unauthorized to venture outside the city because the entire world has been destroyed in a nuclear war and is now contaminated with radiation, they're told. This is conducted in exactly the same way citizens of our modern world are scared into government compliance through totally fabricated or engineered stories of terrorism.



When clones are ready to have their organs harvested, they are told they've "won the lottery" to retire in luxury on a tropical island. In reality, they are euthanized and cut open to have their organs harvested for corporate profits.

This scene from the film shows one clone waking up during the organ harvesting procedure and attempting to escape:



The cloned citizens of The Island are brutally controlled by the corporation and forced to live a life of total obedience and conformity. Even their diet is rigorously controlled by the corporation, but not out of any desire to promote health. Rather, it's a desire by the corporation to make sure its "product" remains healthy, harvestable and sellable.

All along, the cloned humans -- which are considered corporate "property" -- are kept wholly oblivious to the real world and told how lucky they are to be the last of the survivors of the nuclear war (which never happened). This is the modern-day equivalent to President Obama telling us all how good the U.S. economy is doing and how lucky we are to be living in America.



What was once sci-fi may soon be reality

The greatest problem with science today is that it almost entirely conforms to corporate interests. As a result, it has no respect for ethics or morals. Whatever makes the most money becomes the new "science" of the day, regardless of the implications for human suffering or widespread tragedy.

Tinkering with life -- via genetic engineering, mass deployment of agricultural chemicals, cloning or organ harvesting -- is a territory fraught with ethical landmines. But motivated by greed, corporations will drive humanity right through a landscape littered with such landmines, oblivious to the violations of ethics, human rights or environmental integrity they are unleashing.

Make no mistake: If it were medically feasible right now to generate millions of dollars in transplant profits from the body of a two-year-old infant, the biotech corporations would have already declared two-year-olds to be "not yet human" and there would be massive farms running right this very minute harvesting organs from two-year-olds. Any person who protested the practice would, of course, be instantly labeled, "anti-science."

Case in point: There's money to be made right now from injecting two-year-olds with toxic metals such as mercury and aluminum, both of which are still intentionally manufactured into vaccines. Any person who protests the injecting of children with mercury is immediately labeled "anti-science" today, even though the science clearly says mercury is toxic to human neurology. Calls for removing neurotoxic substances from vaccines are met with derision by the vaccine industry, which insists all children should be injected with dozens of vaccines no matter how toxic the ingredients in them.

The exploitation of children's bodies has always been a profit center for medical corporations, and human organ harvesting, growing and transplantation may simply be the next step up for an industry deeply rooted in the evil that comes from ignoring medical ethics while prioritizing medical profits.

In effect, we are all living in The Island and being lied to on a daily basis about what's real. The truth, it turns out, does not support the profit interests of the all-powerful corporations.

Sources for this story include:
[1] http://www.livescience.com/49503-human-kidneys-grown-in-rats.html?cmpid=558958
[2] http://www.theguardian.com/law/2011/jun/02/nigeria-baby-farm-raided-human-trafficking
[3] http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0399201/


Tuesday, March 3, 2015

ATTORNEY SPEAKS OUT ABOUT PRO-VACCINE LIES AND EFFECTIVE WAYS TO FILE LAWSUITS AGAINST BIG PHARMA AND THE GOVERNMENT



Source Article:
Attorney Demolishes Pro-Vaccine Talking Points, Lays Bare The Shocking Facts About Vaccination Risks & Dangers
http://www.realfarmacy.com/attorney-demolishes-pro-vaccine-talking-points-lays-bare-shocking-facts-vaccination-risks-dangers/


The following exposé on vaccine safety and their inherent dangers is noteworthy because it is written by a Washington State attorney who really understands the profound legal ramifications. James Deal, J.D. wastes no time in completely deconstructing the many false assertions that are routinely presented by those government and corporate entities promoting a super-vaccination agenda.

More importantly, Attorney Deal furnishes the American people with the substantive legal arguments which can serve as the basis for lawsuits against both the Pharmaceutical Industry and the U.S. Federal Government. When considered in the aggregate, the implicit points of law delineated below constitute a legal foundation for a clear-cut criminal indictment. Great harm is being inflicted on the children throughout the country by mandatory, state-sponsored vaccination programs.

No entity under the sun has the right or lawful authority to arrogate power unto itself to harm or injure, sicken or infect, paralyze or kill the people of this nation. Not only is such conduct a serious breach of the social contract, it represents a profound violation of the public trust. Vaccination programs therefore break the inviolable bond between the citizenry and the government.


VACCINES: AN ATTORNEY’S VIEWPOINT
You Cannot Generalize Pro or Con About All Vaccines

James Robert Deal J.D.


The report below was recently sent to every representative and senator in the Washington legislature and to all the newspapers in Washington. Attorney James Deal believes that the personal or philosophical objection will be retained at the state level.

“They have all the money, but we have all the good ideas. If we persevere, we will succeed.”
~ James Robert Deal, J.D.

*******

Anti-vaxxers oppose all vaccines. Pro-vaxxers favor all vaccines. No, it is not that simple. Pro-vaxxers admit that certain groups should not receive certain vaccines and that vaccine injury does happen, although it is “rare”.

Most so-called anti-vaxxers actually favor some vaccines but oppose others. Most oppose giving many vaccines all at one time. Most say they are only asking for safer vaccines.

Amid the name calling, there is a reasonable middle ground. Dr. Mark Geier, M.D., Ph.D., associated with Johns Hopkins and the National Institutes of Health, author of over a hundred peer reviewed journal articles, is a moderate we should pay attention to. (Go to YouTube and search for “Dr. Mark Geier Thimerosal”.)

Dr. Geier supports the measles-only vaccine, but he opposes the MMR, measles-mumps-rubella vaccine, because it has caused confirmed adverse reactions and death. Likewise, Dr. Gregory Poland, of the Mayo Clinic holds that the MMR is largely ineffective.

It is lazy language to say that vaccines are “safe and effective”, because that implies that all vaccines are safe and effective for all people. In fact, some vaccines have done great harm. If you doubt this, read the findings of the Vaccine Court, which has paid out around $3.0 billion to children for adverse reactions which admits were caused by vaccines. Go to www.uscfc.uscourts.gov/opinion-search and search for “measles-mumps-rubella” or “influenza”. And read the package inserts that come with vaccine boxes. You may also read them online at www.immunize.org/packageinserts

In Europe only the polio vaccine is mandatory. Dr. Geier supports vaccination against polio. However, he is adamantly opposed to flu vaccines. The flu vaccine given almost universally uses Thimerosal as a preservative. Each dose of Thimerosal contains 25 micrograms of ethyl mercury. Multiplied by Avogadro’s Number, 25 mcg = 75 quadrillion atoms of mercury.


25 x 10-6 / 200 x 6.02 x 10-23

10-6 x 10-23 = 10-17

25 / 200 x 6.02 = .7525

.7525 x 10-17 = 7.5 x 10-16 = 75 x 10-15 =

75,000,000,000,000,000 = 75 quadrillion


The only safe amount of mercury is zero, and using mercury as a preservative is reckless, especially since it is given yearly, even to pregnant mothers, even though the package insert admits that the MMR has not been tested for fetal safety in pregnant women. Mercury passes through the placenta and into the fetus. There are flu vaccines which are mercury free.

The flu vaccine is big business, particularly the ones containing mercury. Some 300 million doses are sold, while only 20 million doses of all other vaccines are sold. In 1986 the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program made vaccine manufacturers immune from most liability, and in 2011 the Supreme Court twisted the plain language of the Vaccine Act to make vaccine manufacturers, hospitals, and physicians completely immune from absolutely ALL liability, reasoning that vaccines in general – using the language of the Court – are “unavoidably unsafe”.

Dr. Geier points out that all flu vaccines are illegal. All vaccines must pass two double blind tests for safety and effectiveness. Because a new vaccine is developed each year in advance of the flu season, and because each vaccine assumes a prediction of which strains of flue will be present, there is no time to two double blind studies, which would take several years.

Our vaccines can contain aluminum, formaldehyde, MSG, antibiotics, and monkey kidney cells. The effort to develop safe and effective vaccines should continue, however, we must admit that we are still at a primitive stage in the development of vaccines, which is why mandating vaccination makes little sense.

The unvaccinated are blamed for spreading disease, however, every person injected with the MMR and other attenuated live virus vaccines develops a vaccine version of the disease, sheds viruses, and can infect others. It is not only the unvaccinated who are spreading measles, which is another reason why mandating vaccination makes little sense.

Measles is not a trifling malady, however, it is not Ebola. Measles cases and deaths from measles declined sharply before the measles vaccine was introduced in 1963. Relatively few die from measles.

Since 1986, Health & Human Services reports 669 deaths from the DTP, 84 deaths from flu vaccines, 80 deaths from the DTaP, 57 deaths from the MMR, 54 deaths from the Hepatitis B vaccine, and many more non-fatal adverse reactions. The science of vaccination is still in a primitive stage, and it is inappropriate for the state to force injection of a possibly harmful drug on behalf of mega-corporations which are completely immune from all liability for adverse reactions.

Further, one who is vaccinated sheds viruses, and so one can be infected not only by those who contract a wild case of measles but also by those recently vaccinated. Moreover, the MMR is not particularly effective In an October 2011 outbreak in Canada, over 50% of the 98 individuals had received two doses of measles vaccine”.

The Los Angeles Times and the Everett Herald printed an article entitled “Vaccine ignorance proving deadly and contagious”. It was written not by physicians or scientists but by prominent members of the Council on Foreign Relations. It contains numerous inaccuracies – scientific, historical, and legal.

Thinking people support vaccines which are safe, effective, and necessary. Conversely, thinking people should oppose those vaccines which are not safe, not effective, or not necessary.

Law school taught me to break a question down into its component parts: Which vaccines are safe, effective, and necessary, and for whom? How deadly is the disease to be prevented? How likely are adverse reactions and how bad can they be? The CFR authors are uncritical cheer leaders for the $30 billion per year vaccine business, exhorting us to take all recommended vaccines unquestioningly and by the dozens and dozens.

The authors repeat slanders made against Dr. Andrew Wakefield, which were completely false. A recent NOVA special, “Vaccines – Calling the Shots”, repeats these now-disproven slanders, a case of lazy journalism. Recall that Wakefield wrote in the Lancet in 1998 that colitis and autism spectrum disorders are linked to the combined measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine then in use.

Wakefield was denounced as a vaccine denier, although he supported and still supports the single dose measles vaccine, as well as other vaccines. He only opposed the MMR. Multiple vaccines given simultaneously can be more harmful than single vaccines. For questioning the safety of one vaccine, Wakefield was “lynched” by GlaxoSmithCline and the medical establishment. Wakefield’s results have been replicated in at least 28 studies done by scientists in other countries. Further, Wakefield has great insight in how to treat children who have had adverse vaccine reactions by treating the gastro-intestinal disease that accompanies adverse reactions.

Wakefield was expelled from the medical profession in Great Britain, however, John Walker-Smith, one of the co-authors of the offending 1998 study, challenged his expulsion and was recently reinstated, an indication that Wakefield could be reinstated if he applied. Wakefield works in Texas as a researcher and is suing Brian Deer, Fiona Godlee and the British Medical Journal for falsely accusing him of fraud.

The CFR authors also seem to be unaware that Wakefield was further vindicated recently when Dr. William Thompson of the CDC “came out”. Thompson was one of the authors of a CDC study which denied any causal link between vaccines and autism. Thompson admitted that in a 2004 article he and other authors had intentionally excluded already collected data, data which would have reversed their published conclusion that there is no vaccine-autism link. The mainstream media has glossed over the story of Wakefield’s vindication and Thomson’s confession.

A mother is not a vaccine denier if she questions the safety of a vaccine containing mercury, aluminum, MSG, antibiotics, eggs, or formaldehyde. Or Beta HCG hormone. Or the urabi virus . She is not a denier if her child is frail or has already had an adverse vaccine reaction and she chooses to opt her child out. She is not a denier if she questions giving children 49 injections of 14 vaccines by age six, including a vaccine at birth for hepatitis B, a disease usually infecting IV drug users. Nor is she a denier if she declines the CDC recommendation that she take the flu vaccine (containing mercury) when she is pregnant, even though the flu vaccine is not tested for safety for pregnant women and fetuses and the FDA advises it be used “only if clearly needed”.

Most are not harmed by vaccines, but some are. For proof read the decisions of the Vaccine Court, which has paid out some $3.0 billion and has acknowledged that specific vaccines have caused specific harms. See the disclosure inserts which comes in vaccine boxes. Ask your pharmacist for copies. Multi-dose flu vaccine contains a whopping 25 micrograms of mercury per dose, included as a preservative. That’s 74 quadrillion atoms of mercury. The single dose version contains under 1.0 micrograms, only 3 quadrillion atoms – still too much for me. The mercury in the flu vaccine passes through the placenta and is especially toxic to fetus and infant because their cells are dividing rapidly. Mercury affects cell division. The use of mercury as a preservative should be banned.

Some vaccines are ineffective. Discover Magazine reported that 73 percent of kids aged 7 to 10 who caught pertussis in 2012 in Washington had been fully vaccinated. The same is true for the measles vaccine. A child vaccinated with a live virus vaccine experiences a mild version of the infection and is thus contagious and infects others. Outbreaks of measles and pertussis probably come from the vaccinated, not from the unvaccinated. The artificial immunity conferred by vaccines wears off, and boosters are required, making vaccines a cash machine that generates $30 billion yearly.

A reasonable question to ask is this: If vaccines worked, those who favor indiscriminate vaccination should not object to those who choose not to be vaccinated.

The problem worsened in 1986. Before that date vaccine liability had always been decided according to state law regardless of which court the case was brought in. 1986 Congress federalized all vaccine liability claims. A law was passed requiring that all claims for vaccine harm go to a special “Vaccine Court”, where there was and is no jury and no pre-trial discovery. The statute of limitations is tricky and short, and the burden to prove a specific vaccination harmed a child is arbitrarily difficult. Vaccine makers are shielded against general liability and even for badly designing a vaccine. Claims are paid out of a fund built up with a tax on each vaccine dose sold. This has led vaccine makers to become reckless, to do insufficient testing of vaccines, and to industrialize the vaccine business.

Before 1986, vaccination had been a technology aimed at the most deadly and contagious diseases. Vaccines were to be put into use only after careful testing. Vaccines were and are needed when a potentially fatal disease progresses so fast the body cannot respond before death occurs. Because adverse reactions are inevitable, vaccines should not be used to prevent diseases which are rarely fatal. However, vaccine makers, newly exempt from all liability, turned necessary vaccination against the most deadly diseases into a mass-production money machine targeted against any and every conceivable disease.

Vaccine makers ship vaccines banned in the West to the Third World, such as the urabi strain MMR vaccine, the dangerous partially attenuated oral polio vaccine used in Pakistan, and a tetanus vaccine which causes miscarriages – none of which would inspire one to trust what vaccine makers say.

All drugs and all vaccines involve some risk which the CDC admits in its assurances that serious harm or death is rare. If the risk of taking the vaccine is greater than the risk of enduring the disease, one has the right to refuse to take the vaccine. Adults can refuse vaccination for themselves. They are the guardians of their children. They know their children’s frailties and previous bad experiences with vaccines. They have the right to opt their children out. If vaccinations work, there should be no objection if some choose not to be vaccinated.

Washington has recently made it more difficult for parents to decline vaccination for their children. Unvaccinated children can be sent home if there is an outbreak of a childhood disease in his or her school, which is odd since the CDC admits, in the case of pertussis, it is vaccinated children who are spreading the disease.

Despite all the evidence that some vaccines cause serious harm, many so-called experts exhort us that all vaccines are safe and effective, and most people stubbornly believe them. Why? Mark Twain explained it best “It’s much easier to fool someone than to convince them they have been fooled.

Examine the evidence for yourself and do your own thinking. Administration of vaccine in mass quantities should not be mandatory, and some vaccines should be banned outright.

The connection between the fluoride scam and the vaccine scam is that they are both run by mega corporations without ethical standards.

We should not be afraid to follow the science where ever it logically goes and be outspoken on other contaminations, such as Roundup, which I just learned is sprayed on non-GMO wheat as a desiccant, so most non-organic bread is loaded with Roundup.

Saturday, February 28, 2015

PLEASE JOIN ME AT THE FREE YOUR MIND CONFERENCE



Please join me April 10-12, 2015 at the Free Your Mind Conference in Philadelphia, PA. This conference is bringing together an AMAZING group of powerful whistleblowers like Fritz Springmeier, Freeman Fly, Mark Passio, Bob Tuskin, Lenon Honor, Stewart Swerdlow, Clint Richardson, Jay Parker, Josie the Outlaw, Laura Eisnehower, Mark Devlin, and many more. For those interested in topics related to the manipulation of consciousness through mind control and/or the subversive occult influences that have attempted to dominate our lives, this conference is a MUST ATTEND!!!

It is time for us to gather together so that our united energies can send ripples of transformation and awakening throughout the cosmos!!!



NOW IS THE TIME!!!


Check out this website and please consider meeting me there!!!


FREE YOUR MIND 3
http://freeyourmindconference.com/
April 10-12, 2015


Purchase your tickets today and get a $15.00 discount when you enter the Promo Code: barcelo







Wednesday, January 28, 2015

WHITE COATS - BLACK MEDICINE - INTERVIEW WITH JEANICE BARCELO AND DR. REBECCA CARLEY



Interview with Randy Maugans on Off Planet Radio - Jan. 23, 2015. Topics include conscious conception, human sexuality, the implications of carnality and haphazard conception, prenatal trauma, discovery shock, IVF, artificial reproductive technologies, post-mortem sperm retrieval, abortion, pedophilia, pornography, attempted theft of the soul.

See Jeanice's book for more info: Birth Trauma and the Dark Side of Modern Medicine -- http://birthofanewearth.com/?p=3790

Here is an excerpt from the interview:

“What I want to stress is that there are forces behind the media and who are running the school system right now – they are Jewish. They call themselves jewish. I am not saying that they are actually practicing any kind of quality religion. They’re luciferians. They’re satanists. They call themselves jews. They are worshiping lucifer. Their intention is to get everybody to behave from base carnal impulses because they know if we create children from this place, our children are screwed for life. Our children are altered from the gate. As soon as we conceive them haphazardly, as a side effect of our fleshy indulgence, we are cursing them and we are condemning them to a life of pain and trauma. And so the luciferian forces who call themselves jews,

WHO CONTROL PORNOGRAPHY: (http://birthofanewearth.blogspot.com/2014/10/pornography-and-destruction-of-society.html),

WHO CONTROL WHAT'S CALLED 'SEX EDUCATION' IN OUR SCHOOLS:
(http://birthofanewearth.blogspot.com/2014/08/child-pornography-in-classroom.html),

WHO ARE TEACHING FIVE-YEAR-OLDS ABOUT MASTURBATION: (http://birthofanewearth.blogspot.com/2014/09/children-as-young-five-should-be-taught.html),

AND TEN-YEAR-OLDS ABOUT ANAL SEX: (http://birthofanewearth.blogspot.com/2014/11/chicago-schools-teaching-10-year-olds.html),

WHO ARE TEACHING 10-YEAR-OLDS TO USE CONDOMS: (http://birthofanewearth.blogspot.com/2014/02/schools-now-teaching-9-year-olds-how-to.html),

and all throughout – from 5-years-old on, they’re saying “HAVE SEX, HAVE SEX, HAVE SEX!” Put your condom on. That’s all it takes. “HAVE SEX, HAVE SEX, HAVE SEX!” This way, you can have abortions and we can harness the human sacrifice of your babies for our own ends. And we can harness the life force of your children because you haven’t been willing to take responsibility to control your carnality! This is what’s really going on folks! And we better get a handle on this. And we have all of the power to do so.

Let me say something else, alright? Women have so much power to simply change everything overnight. And you know how we could do it? By simply refusing to have sex with men that go to war. Not only would those men stop going to war because they wouldn’t be able to find a partner, but that whole bloodline of idiots that are working for the dark forces – those bloodlines would come to an end – al because women have stood up in self-respect and said “You know what, I’m not going to perpetuate this evil! I’m going to control my carnal impulses and not let my sexual attractions compel me to make children with men that are not worthy of becoming fathers.” How simple is that!”

...These entities are the ones -- they are now calling themselves jews -- their bible is the Talmud. The Talmud tells them that it's OK to have sex with three-year-old children (http://birthofanewearth.blogspot.com/2014/09/the-sexualization-of-children-and.html)...

They despise us. They're so jealous of us. They're so envious of us. And their greatest achievement is to distort our sexuality, to distort the way that we create life, and to try to harness it themselves through artificial reproductive technologies..."

Jeanice Barcelo
http://BirthofaNewEarth.com

Dr. Rebecca Carley
http://reversingvaccineinduceddiseases.com

Original recording of this show at http://radio.offplanetmedia.net/2015/01/26/jeanice-barcelo-dr-rebecca-carley-white-coats-black-medicine/



Jeanice Barcelo and Dr. Rebecca Carley on White Coats/Black Medicine
http://youtu.be/wlfU9d2mSNM


GEO-ENGINEERED SNOW STORM HITS EAST COAST -- WHAT'S THE REAL AGENDA?





KNOW YOUR ENEMY! The same people who've been worshiping this bull for centuries (and who now own and control almost all the US media outlets) are the very same people who GEO-ENGINEERED the massive storm that just hit the east coast. That storm was deliberately steered directly into New York City and it was kept hovering over the area for many hours with the help of chemtrails and HAARP technology. The dark ones wanted to make sure it would dump maximum amounts of snow -- and the real reason for this is because they wanted to test the population here in New York in order to determine if the people were going to accept martial law. The shut down of all roads and all transportation into and out of New York City was a test run designed to mimic martial law. The shut down was not done to keep anyone safe but rather to psychologically prepare New Yorkers for what they are planning next -- and to see how New Yorkers would respond. Their evil agenda is so transparent at this point it makes me want to throw up.

Monday, January 26, 2015

IN THE WORDS OF A RITUAL CIRCUMCISER



"But the mohel (circumciser) with whom I had worked countless times suddenly handed me the knife. He pointed to my squirming son, whose hands and legs were tied to the board. The foreskin had been pulled up over the glans of the penis and was now protruding through a narrow slit of the small, stainless steel clamp. . . . 'It's the greatest honor a father can have,' he added. . . . There is no greater primal anger than that caused by seeing another male in carnal contact with your wife, in this case the physical intimacy of mother and son. And there is no greater primal envy than that caused by looking down at the person who was brought into the world specifically to be your survivor. . . . The breast provides, but the knife protects. It channels the father's natural anger and jealousy into one controlled cut. He takes off one small part in order to preserve -- and love -- the whole. . . . No father should be denied this experience, even vicariously, of inflicting upon his child a ritualized blow so intense as to make him both shake and recoil . . ."


Birth Rite by Joshua J. Hammerman
THE NEW YORK TIMES MAGAZINE, March 13, 1994.
http://www.cirp.org/pages/cultural/hammerman/

Saturday, January 24, 2015

BIRTH TRAUMA & THE DARK SIDE OF MODERN MEDICINE

Exposing Systematic Violence During Hospital Birth and the Attempt to Hijack our Souls




"This is one of the most important books published in this century... PLEASE, those of you preparing to birth, those of you who already have, those of you preparing to become Nurses or Midwives, those of you who are not aware of the psychological affect the birthing process (as it is conducted today) has on our entire societal structure - read this major work. It will hold you spellbound. This book is not only for women, but for men as well who sometimes suffer post stress syndrome after the birth of their children. Understanding this book will help you understand the depth of dis-function families suffer, and why. Jeanice Barcelo's book is a monumental contribution to our culture."
-- Rev. Marian Adams


Dear Friends — It is with great excitement that I share with you about the completion of my first book entitled “Birth Trauma and the Dark Side of Modern Medicine: Exposing Systematic Violence During Hospital Birth and the Attempt to Hijack our Souls.” In this book, I expose the violence of western medicine through the sharing of many personal stories of severe birth trauma combined with little known information about the cult of modern medicine, including the mind control of medical students who are forced to engage in atrocities in order to become official members of the cult.

The book also covers a wide array of topics including vaccines, circumcision, abuse in neonatal intensive care units, birth rape, cesarean section, induction of labor, the dangers of drugs like cytotec, pitocin, and epidural anesthesia during labor, and even a section about the dark side of artificial reproductive technologies and the pain of IVF children. Additionally, the book contains rarely discussed information about prenatal trauma and the impact of the first nine months on the rest of our lives.

The book is an intense read but the revelations presented are so important that I hope many people will read it.

I would like to ask for your help today as I seek to raise money to cover the costs for promotion and marketing of my book and to assist in the purchase of as many paperback copies as possible. I would like to have the paperback copies on hand so that I might offer personally signed copies to my biggest fans. I would also like to give some copies as gifts to the incarcerated men here on Long Island that have participated in my parenting classes (which is a completely volunteer effort on my part).

There are several ways you can contribute to helping me move this information out there.

1. Purchase a copy of the PDF version of the book right now for $11.99 by following this link, and purchase one for your friends and family members too!






2. Preorder a copy of the paperback through me (rather than through Amazon) for $17.99 (plus shipping) and as soon as the paperbacks are in my hand, I will mail you your copy (should be within 2-4 weeks). You can pre-order the paperback by clicking here:
http://birthofanewearth.com/?p=3790



3. Donate a minimum of $25 to support my work and you will immediately receive a PDF copy of the book sent directly to their email.


4. Donate a minimum of $100 and you will receive a personally signed copy of the paperback within the next 4-6 weeks.


5. Donate $200 or more and you will receive a personally signed copy of the paperback and have the option of scheduling a private skype session with me for the healing of prenatal or birth trauma.


Donations can be made here:







THANK YOU FOR BEING PART OF MY COMMUNITY AND PART OF THE WAVE OF CHANGE THAT IS DESTINED TO TRANSFORM THE WORLD!


May this book reach millions of people and their lives be forever transformed.


Thank you for your support. Wishing you all good things and may this year be the best year yet.




PS – here is a beautiful review of my book from my esteemed friend, John Kaminski.


Medical monsters turn joy into horror

Greedy doctors' focus on profit destroys mother-child bonding


A review of
Birth Trauma and the Dark Side of Modern Medicine
Exposing Systematic Violence During Hospital Birth and the Attempt to Hijack Our Souls
By Jeanice Barcelo, M.A.,
http://birthofanewearth.com


By John Kaminski
pseudoskylax@gmail.com
http://therebel.org/en/kaminski


Is the world going mad and are people a lot more unhappy than they should be because of the barbaric way doctors treat mothers when they deliver their babies?

Jeanice Barcelo's gut wrenching indictment of the way hospitals and doctors brutally manipulate pregnant mothers in Birth Trauma, and the Dark Side of Modern Medicine, Exposing the Systematic Violence Against Women and Infants During Hospital Birth insists this interference in the mother/child bond is a key element in the breakdown of human love worldwide.

The medical profession has its own rules about delivering babies, and the way Barcelo tells it, these methods not only create lasting scars in mothers, destroy many marriages and unnecessarily injure and kill children. They also leave a great uninvestigated tragedy of infants who do not properly bond with their mothers as a result of medical expedience more interested in profitable procedures than in healthy children.

Its effect on the world — but most especially on women and children, she insists — is catastrophic.

Ordinary readers, especially men brave enough to tackle the subject, will view with unadulterated horror the things that are done to babies in the name of keeping them healthy. Like screwing fetal heart monitors into their skulls. Or memory block drugs used for a variety of purposes including sexual molestation.

"Doctors don't care if mom and the baby are damaged"

Barcelo calls this birth trauma a hidden epidemic, and cites a 1995 study that determined 95 percent of all births in the U.S. were considered traumatic, 45% severely traumatic. The Centers for Disease Control, she says, are responsible for causing the deaths of thousands of unborn babies, because vaccinations cause a massive spike in fetal deaths.

An increasing number of birthing mothers recall their experiences as "birth rape", and following the extreme level of abuse they receive in hospitals, post traumatic stress afflicts many of them.

The level of malfeasance Barcelo itemizes in her examples of women giving birth reveals a glossary of horrors facing every woman who plans to have her baby delivered in a hospital.

The most magic moment of every mother's life is turned into a nightmare by cash conscious doctors who misuse drugs not meant for childbirth to trigger induction — forcibly ejecting babies from the womb at the profound cost of severing the psychological bond between mother and child and predisposing that child to both afflictions and addictions later in life that need not otherwise occur.

The cost to society is extraordinary, tragic and mostly unacknowledged, the author stresses.

"The core of our pain starts at childbirth. It's about our own mothers handing over their power" to a conscienceless machine that rings babies through a medical cash register which simply doesn't treat them as the supremely sensitive and vulnerable human beings they are.

"They are birthing babies in violence and leaving infants alone at the gate in nurseries of horror, all done for power and gain.

"Knock 'em out and pull 'em out — it has all the elements of rape," says Barcelo, who herself has experienced five traumatic pregnancies that provided her with firsthand knowledge of how this miracle of birth is turned into a nightmare by the heavy handed processes used in for-profit hospitals.

Central to the tragedy is the use of epidural drugs, which accelerate the birth process. These cut off mothers' conscious contact with their babies and not only deprive them of the most special moments of their lives as mothers, but sabotage the bond with their child for life.

'Pit to distress'

Barcelo cites two main drugs as the major culprits in ruining the birth experience: cytotec (an ulcer drug) and pitocin, neither of which are recommended for use in labor but are widely used to hasten the contrived necessity of Cesarean section surgeries.

"We have the highest C-Section rate in the world because these drugs cut off oxygen to the babies and disrupt bonding and breastfeeding. Both drugs are linked to oxycodone addiction late in life as well as autism."

The use of pitocin, Barcelo explains, is often referred to as "pit to distress", or to deliberately put the baby in danger to more quickly necessitate the C-section option, which many mothers describe as not giving birth at all, but to having their baby stolen from them.

Also hair trigger decisions to abandon efforts to keep babies alive in Barcelo's experience are really often fictitious brain death diagnoses that enable lucrative organ harvesting.

And the damage is not only to mother and child, but also to fathers, as it was for one dad who "lost my connection to my wife that I never regained" for what was perceived as failure to protect his wife when doctors induced a C-section without parental permission. The PTSD that often comes with trauma not only afflicts babies and their mothers, but also distraught dads.

But the pain of accelerating the birth process is more than emotional, as the testimony of a mother who tried to give birth at home but was forced to call paramedics vividly attests. Doctors routinely inject paralytic drugs but often don't use anesthetics on patients they don't like to punish them for being recalcitrant. One woman Barcelo quotes describes how she was given an incredibly painful C-section without anesthesia, but being paralyzed, was unable to protest.

"The torture of infants and mothers happens regularly," Barcelo writes matter-of-factly.

Bowels of the technological underworld

Barcelo writes:

"Worst of all in the fact that C-sectioned babies often end up in neonatal intensive care units, and those born before 39 weeks are twice as likely as those born vaginally to be kept in a NICU due to respiratory distress. Once a baby ends up in the NICU, the possibility for healthy bonding is further degraded.

"NICUs are like the bowels of the technological underworld. They are places where infants are literally held captive for weeks and months, and subjected to all manner of painful and tortuous medical procedures, most of the time without being given any kind of pain relief whatsoever."

Once a baby gets into an NICU, she is subjected to 14 to 21 invasive procedures per day, all without anesthesia, and the parents have no say over the treatment, nor can they remove their child from the NICU. The experience of pain, Barcelo writes, completely changes the wiring of the brain in adulthood.

The story of Andrew and his five months of torture plus his $100,000 medical bill that preceded his death will curl your toenails, guaranteed.

"Babies are being used for medical experiments," Barcelo writes. One government study that included data from Wake Forest and Yale universities involved deliberately depriving babies of oxygen to observe the results, which very often was death.

Barcelo reserves special scorn for the use of ultrasound frequencies, which are extremely dangerous to babies. "To me," Barcelo writes, "this indicates a distinct level of evil within the medical profession. It is a clear indication that they are willing and able to deliberately cause harm."

The lie that babies don't feel pain

Of all of the horrific descriptions Barcelo has put forth in her descriptions of the barbaric birth process, the one that rattled this reviewer the most was the widespread practice of medical procedures on babies based on the principle that babies do not feel pain.

A woman demanded to see hospital records after her son's death in 1985. She said, 'Somehow it was possible for professionals who perceived a baby as too fragile to tolerate general anesthesia to perceive that same infant as able to withstand open-chest surgery without pain relief. . . .' At two weeks (old), during his hour and half operation, Jeffrey had two holes cut on either side of his neck and one in his chest, he was cut from his breastbone around to his backbone, his flesh lifted aside, ribs pried apart, blood vessels tied off and lungs retreated, tissue stitched together and a 'stab incision' to secure chest tubes. He died a few days later as a result of the shock that overwhelmed his entire system causing his brain to bleed and his organs to fail. The hospital's senior neonatologist responded to his mother's inquiries by stating 'it didn't matter because he was a fetus,' explaining that children less than 2 years of age do not feel pain . . .

"Such is the arrogance and extreme insanity of esteemed members of the medical profession who have continued to insist for more than 100 years that babies do not feel pain," Barcelo writes.

She also is on top of the latest bogus claim by the CDC that infant circumcision will prevent HIV when an avalanche of medical research claims the opposite. Barcelo blames the CDC pronouncement on "a well orchestrated media campaign by the Jews" that enables doctors to continue the most common surgery in America be performed on babies without anesthesia.

Even disregarding the savage practice of Jewish rabbis, studies have shown that ordinary circumcision trauma lasts a lifetime.

In addition, African countries have the highest rate of circumcision and the highest rate of HIV. And in Norway, the only country that records the circumcision status of rapists, the 2 percent of the population who are circumcised commit 80 percent of the rapes.

So how does the medical system do it? How do they turn good and decent people into biological robots who parrot nonsense and can't seem to think for themselves? The answer lies in the indoctrination process is set-up to systematically break down the morality and the will of medical students, and, if all goes according to plan, will cause a split in their psyche that will result in dissociation and the assimilation of an alter personality that will be willing to conform to medical norms.

The horrors in these satanic birth factories seem to go on forever.

• Cells from aborted babies are also being used for "flavor enhancing research" by companies like Senomyx and residue from aborted babies can be found in products made by Pepsi, Nestle, Kraft, and Campbell, all of whom have hired Senomyx to do their "flavor enhancing research".

• Israel is on the cutting edge of this Luciferian technology and it is involved in something called "post mortem sperm retrieval," which involves harvesting sperm from dead men.

And lastly,

According to Dr. Paul Byrne, 80-year neonatologist exposing the dark side of organ donation, "brain death" is a completely fictitious diagnosis conjured up by the underworld demigods for purposes of finding a way to legalize the harvesting of organs while people are still very much alive. Organ donation in the U.S. is an extremely dark business, with living people being wheeled into operating rooms and having their chests cleaved open and their organs removed one at a time at the hands of medical sadists . . . The organ removal is done without anesthesia in the U.S., but with the victims instead being given paralysis drugs so that they cannot move or scream while they are being tortured and murdered by medical doctors.

"Many people now allege that the CDC's real purpose is genocide and depopulation, and that vaccines are biological weapons purposefully being used to create mass sterilization, disease and death. These programs are being used to deliberately depopulate the Earth, Barcelo insists, pointing out the chart on www.deagel.com that forecasts a drop in the U.S. population from 316 million to 69 million by 2025."

Jeanice Barcelo comes through a tragic lineage of the haunted womb, from a mother and grandmother who never bonded with their children. In reporting that 75% of mothers have received an epidural during labor prior to birthing their children, she is in a sad majority of children who did not receive the love they should have when they first appeared in the world.

That means that three quarters of the children who are born in this country do not receive the optimum amount of love from their mothers that they rightfully should, and looking at the world around us, the sad result of that tragedy is all too clear.

For more information about or to purchase a copy of Birth Trauma and the Dark Side of Modern Medicine, go to http://birthofanewearth.com.



John Kaminski is a writer who lives on the Gulf Coast of Florida, constantly trying to figure out why we are destroying ourselves, and pinpointing a corrupt belief system as the engine of our demise. Solely dependent on contributions from readers, please support his work by mail: 6871 Willow Creek Circle #103, North Port FL 34287 USA.
http://therebel.org/en/kaminski
http://johnkaminski.info/
http://www.rudemacedon.ca/kaminski/kam-index.html
http://web.archive.org/web/20040323232319/http://johnkaminski.com/





Pre-publication PDF Version Available Now

To purchase the PDF version for the low price of $11.99, simply click on the following link. Your book will be sent to the email address you use to make the purchase.





CONSCIOUS CONCEPTION AND THE HEALING OF OUR SOULS


Jeanice Barcelo - Conscious Conception
http://youtu.be/ZRrXUnhEweM


Prenatal life is the basis for the health of body, mind, and spirit. Prenatal experiences lay the foundation for our understanding of relationship and human love. The consciousness of the parents during conception, whether they want to bring a baby into this world or not, whether they love each other, etc. - all of this has an impact on the baby. Every experience the child has in the womb will shape that child's physical health as well as his/her spiritual awareness, personality, and emotions throughout life. What passes for "prenatal care" in our society is nothing less than trauma-based mind control designed to break our children's link with the Divine Mind. This material is rarely, if ever, discussed and yet the truth is, conscious conception should be the focus of our solution for society. If we want to change the world, we must change how we create life and how we give birth. With awareness, intention, and love we can co-create reality with our children and our children's children to see a magnificent tomorrow. This is an amazing interview with Jeanice Barcelo, Freeman Fly, and Jamie Hanshaw. Not to be missed. For Part 2 of this interview, see: http://freemantv.com/conscious-conception-jeanice-barcelo/

Friday, January 23, 2015

JOIN ME AT THE FREE YOUR MIND CONFERENCE IN APRIL 2015



Dear friends - I am so pleased to announce that I will be speaking at the ‪Free Your Mind 3 Conference‬ this coming April, 2015, in Philadelphia, PA. The line-up of speakers is amazing and they include Fritz Springmeier, Lenon Honor, Freeman Fly, Bob Tuskin, Mark Passio, Jay Parker, Stewart Swerdlow, Josie the Outlaw, Laura Eisenhower, and many other incredible people who are bringing truth to Mankind! It's time to break free from the mind control! Please consider attending this conference. I would love to meet you in person. Get a $15 discount on tickets by typing "Barcelo" as the promo code at checkout. I hope to see you there!!


FREE YOUR MIND returns to Philadelphia in 2015 with a three-day conference featuring top-caliber whistle-blowers and researchers from across the country who will shed light upon our world’s problems and bring forward empowering solutions.

LEARN MORE HERE: http://freeyourmindconference.com/

Thursday, January 22, 2015

HOW TO BREASTFEED APPROPRIATELY -- HILARIOUS!!!



Source Article:
How to Breastfeed Appropriately
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bunmi-laditan/how-to-breastfeed-appropriately_b_5530806.html

So you've decided to breastfeed. Fantastic! Breastfeeding is a wonderful way to nourish your baby while establishing early bonding. Unfortunately, breast milk comes out of breasts so there are a few ground rules that we need to cover.

As you know, (female) modesty is a highly protected value in modern society. Unless you're a magazine cover model or in a music video, exposing your female udder flesh is entirely inappropriate. Science has proven that breasts are basically large vaginas. Only you and your partner should ever see them. Just because your breast-ginas are full of milk, doesn't mean you get to wave them around.

"I don't expose much when I breastfeed." This is a common excuse made by exhibitionist mothers. Just knowing that your nipples may become visible at any time is offensive and a temptation to married or newly engaged men.

Real life stories:

"I saw a woman breastfeeding in a park and was overcome with desire. I left my wife the same day." - John, 34, Nebraska

"I was a married man with eight kids. Last month I saw a woman nursing her infant at a park. I am now married to her." - Luke, 45, South Dakota

"Two years ago I was a successful business executive handling important transactions. Then I saw a breastfeeding mother. I became obsessed with nipples and lost my job. I can't make ends meet." - Anthony, 45

None of us would urinate in public (sober), so please show us the same courtesy and release your mommy nectar out of sight.

Note: Peeing in public and breastfeeding in public are identical because in both cases liquid is coming out. Crying in public is different because it's happening above the neck. If you can breastfeed out of your eye sockets, be my guest.

Here are a few tips that mothers should and need to adopt to help the rest of us feel comfortable.

Tip #1: Use a cover. Every time. There are many fancy ones on the market. Damask. Lace-trimmed. Or how about a swaddling cloth (if it's good enough to warm the baby Jesus, it's good enough for your kid)? Statistics show that human beings love being in confined spaces. Babies are on their way to becoming full humans, so this applies to them as well. I personally eat many of my meals under a loosely draped fitted sheet in my bedroom and find it quite enjoyable.

Please do not use summer as an excuse to flash your flesh-toned milk bags. Just last week I ate an entire Italian sub under a handmade quilt in 90 degree weather skin-to-skin with a close friend to simulate summer breastfeeding. Were we hot? Yes. Were we uncomfortable? Yes. Did one of us briefly lose consciousness? Yes. Did we subject anyone to seeing nipples? NO.

Do not be fooled, the importance of air circulation has been exaggerated by politicians. Ten out of 10 babies reported loving the sensation of breathing repeat CO2. There are women who can breastfeed without anyone knowing what they're doing. If they can do it, so can you because all babies are the same.

If you have a rebellious/bad child who pulls your cover off in a desperate attempt to breathe fresh air and see the world around them, consider some home training. It's your job to teach them right from wrong. Should your original sin infant not respond to discipline and still reach out for new oxygen, place two little straws in their nose scuba-style so that cool air can be retrieved from under a burlap cover without making us all barf from the sight of your boob flesh.

Care about decency? Go the extra mile and prevent wind from flying up and exposing your naked nipples by sewing small weights into the corners of your nursing cover.

Tip #2: Use a bathroom. Who doesn't love a public restroom? They're full of exotic scents and sounds! The next time your needy baby starts fussing for a taste of chest drippings, run to the nearest stall or city outhouse.

Nursing standing up while trying to avoid bacteria and holding a wriggling child has the added benefit of strengthening your core muscles. That postpartum tummy will be gone before you know it, making you more attractive to the general public. It's summer, after all -- bikini season!

No hook for the diaper bag? Put it on the floor or in the sink. When you get home, wipe it down with a bleach and water solution to remove any fecal matter.

If you've used your uterus more than once and have a second, or worse, third child in tow, ask the critters to join you in the stall for their safety. It's like a party! Don't worry, if you've raised them right they won't touch anything.

Considerate babies nurse for between 10-15 minutes, so you'll be out of there before you know it. If you've been cursed with a baby who nurses for 20 minutes or more at a time, cut them off when you see fit. That will teach them to speed things up. Keep track of their best times on your iPhone and give them small rewards (like a hug or kiss on the temple) for shaving off minutes.

Children are meant to be seen and not heard, but if you're rude enough to bring a baby to a public eatery, it's your responsibility to leave the table for the bathroom to nurse. Your meal will be waiting when you return. If your appetite is affected by the smell of light sewage, consider the fantastic weight-loss ramifications and be grateful. You're going to look great in that bikini!

The message is simple: whatever you are doing in public, drop it to move to a private area. Shopping? Return to your vehicle. At a remote park? Find an abandoned train car. Think about others.

Tip #3: When you leave the house, switch to bottles. If your baby hasn't used them before, shame on you for not preparing your infant for the real world. Everyone knows that it is very simple for babies to switch between the breast and bottles and won't at all impact his or her ability to continue breastfeeding in a socially appropriate setting (your bedroom in the dark).

Pumping breast milk is simple, fast and easy. Capable moms know how to squirt out a gallon of milk in under seven minutes. When you need to leave the house, just grab some of your fridge emissions! If your breasts become painfully engorged or hard to the touch from skipping feedings, take comfort in knowing that you're doing this for mankind's comfort level.

Formula is also available and not expensive.

Bottles also give other people a chance to feed the baby. Stop being selfish and hogging all of the feedings with your teats. Having a baby is about letting other people feel good. Pass it around like a football and watch the compliments roll in!

If your baby refuses the bottle, just keep pressing. You'll break their spirit eventually. If not, see tip #4.

Tip #4: Stay home. It would be easier for you and all of us if you just spent the day in your private dwelling. Not forever. Just until your baby learns to take a bottle or eat food that doesn't come out of your privates. There's lots to do in a home: television, hanging out in the backyard (don't nurse there unless you have a high enough wall -- again, RESPECT), cooking, cleaning, laundry and of course, Facebook. Please don't post photos of yourself breastfeeding on the Internet. The last thing anyone on the Internet wants to see are female breasts in an innocent context. We find this disgusting.

Tip #5: Get some morals. Do you have sex in public? No. Then why would you pull out your SEX BREASTS for your baby in public? Just because something is natural, doesn't mean we all want to see it. Yes, we will tolerate a celebrity nip slip or areola display. Yes, there are breasts splashed all over magazine racks and on television bouncing up and down to pop music, but that's different. We're OK with boobs if money has been exchanged. Has your cheap baby paid you? No? Then wrap it up.

In conclusion, breastfeeding in public is for lazy, exhibitionist, thrill-seeking, husband-stealing mothers who have nothing better to do than to make the rest of us shrivel in disgust. So cover it up. Love, Us.

PUTIN SUPPORTS GIVING LAND FOR FREE TO RUSSIAN PEOPLE -- RINGING CEDARS VISION COMING INTO FORM



Source Article:
Homestead Act for Russian Far East – Putin supports free land handout
http://rt.com/politics/224099-russia-land-free-east/

The Russian president has approved the idea to offer large land plots for free to anyone who resettles to the Russian Far East to start a farm or other business.

The initiative was first voiced by the deputy PM and presidential envoy to the Far East Federal District, Yuri Trutnev, who said that such a step would “strengthen the tendency of people’s migration to the Far East,” Interfax reported.

Trutnev told reporters that Putin called the idea right in principle and noted that similar programs had been successfully implemented in Siberia historically. Putin urged all responsible officials to be precise and cautious when detailing the conditions for land ownership, however.

Trutnev’s initial suggestion was to “create a mechanism for the free allocation of a 1 hectare (2.5 acres) plot of land to every resident of the Far East and to anyone who is willing to come and live in the region so that they could start a private business in farming, forestry, game hunting or some other enterprise.”

He added that the agreement could be signed for five years, and then it should either enter full force if the new landlord follows the plan, or be declared void if the land is not used. He also added that corruption in the process of distribution can be prevented if the land plots are far from big cities with their well-developed infrastructure and competitive environment.

The scheme has been designed to limit the possible selling of the land plots to foreign companies and individuals, Trutnev said. “We will give it a try,” he said. “I think this measure will prove to be effective.”

The Far East Federal District is a huge territory, uniting nine federal regions with a total area of over 6 million square kilometers. Included in the Far East are the gold-rich Magadan Region and the diamond-mining Sakha-Yakutiya republic, as well as important seaports and salmon-rich rivers. The district borders China by land and Japan and Alaska by sea.


Saturday, January 17, 2015

VACCINES PROVEN TO CAUSE SUDDEN INFANT DEATH IN CHILDREN




Source Article:
Vaccines Proven To Cause Sudden Death in Children – 67 Deaths Only Explicable As Caused By Vaccines – Drug Safety Regulators Had The Information for Over 2 Years And Let Children Die
https://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/2015/01/13/vaccines-proven-to-cause-sudden-death-in-children-67-deaths-only-explicable-as-caused-by-vaccines-drug-safety-regulators-had-the-information-for-over-2-years-and-let-children-die/


This confirmation vaccines cause children to die suddenly is only hours old and is conclusive. There is no room for argument. It was published today on the US National Library of Medicine’s website.

For decades regulators and public health officials have insisted parents were wrong to blame vaccines when their children died suddenly shortly after vaccination. It was coincidence they would say – nothing more.

The deaths were no more than the number usually to be expected they would add.

But all the time drug safety regulators appear to have been holding the evidence.

A confidential 1271 page GSK document ordered recently by an Italian Court to be published shows that multiple vaccines cause sudden child deaths. [The document is a formal confidential previously unpublished submission by GlaxoSmithKline to the European Medicines Agency from 2011 and 2012.]

The GSK document contains data about deaths occurring as a result of administration of Prevenar 13 vaccine [from Pfizer], Infanrix Hexa from GSK and some other vaccines. Prevenar 13 is given to all British children.

In the past few hours the analysis has been published on the US National Library of Medicines website using the data GSK provided to the European Medicines Agency. The data is conclusive. It is very clear and there is no room for argument.

And the analysis is simple. Anyone can understand it. The very plain data the document contains proves the matter without any doubt whatsoever.

Here is the key point from the published analysis [but there is more to read online]. It is not rocket science but very simple to understand:

(Source: Table 36 The GlaxoSmithKline Biological Clinical Safety and Pharmacovigilance report to Regulatory Authority)…… if one analyses the data looking at deaths in first 10 days after administration of vaccine and compares it to the deaths in the next 10 days, it is clear that 97% of deaths (65 deaths) in the infants below 1 year, occur in the first 10 days and 3% (2 deaths) occur in the next 10 days. Had the deaths been coincidental SIDS deaths unrelated to vaccination, the numbers of deaths in the two 10 day periods should have been the same. Similarly in children older than 1 year, 87.5% deaths (7 deaths) occurred in the first 10 days and 12.5% (1 death) occurred in the next 10 days.

Here is the data presented in a way that the clustering of deaths can be seen clearly [click on the table to open a larger version in a new window:



The clustering of deaths around the time of vaccination demonstrates a link between the vaccination and the sudden deaths. It indicates this is not by chance as otherwise the deaths would be spread across the entire 20 days. Rather than showing the total deaths each day, GlaxoSmithKline disguised the clustering of deaths around vaccination. They did this by listing the cumulative number of deaths. So by day 19 after vaccination GSK’s total was 67 deaths. But there had only been two deaths in those last 10 days and not 67. In contrast 65 deaths occurred on the first day of vaccination up to the 10th day following vaccination.
And here you can see GSK’s Table 36. The way it is prepared disguises the clustering of deaths around the time of vaccination – the total cumulative number of deaths up to 10 days from vaccination is 65. That number over the next 10 days increases by only 2. So in 10 days there were 65 deaths and between day 11 to day 20 after vaccination there were only another two deaths. So only the vaccine can be the cause of this:


TABLE 36 20111216 GSK Infanrix Hexa Summary Bridging Report 16-12-2011

Here is a serious issue. This kind of information is routinely provided to regulators like the MHRA but never made public. On the one occasion such a document is published as a result of the actions of a judge in an Italian Court it is possible to show beyond any doubt that multiple vaccines cause sudden deaths in children.

This appears a serious failing of European regulators.

All the EU regulators including the MHRA have had this information for at least three years and failed to act on it.

Further, the MHRA has an agreement with the drug industry not to publish information like this despite the provisions of the UK Freedom of Information Act.

And here is an example of how slanted news reporting is. The following report is not an independent objective balanced report of the facts:

‘Doctor Claims That Hexavalent Infanrix Vaccine Causes Sudden Death Of Babies,’ Anti-Vaccination Advocates Question Why Report Was Confidential

It is by someone called Dawn Papple apparently from the Greater Detroit Area USA who lists her working activities as Independent Outsourced Freelance Writer, Freelance Writer, Social Media Marketer, Graphic Designer, Independent Contractor.

This appears to be a somewhat racist press report, referring to the information being just from India and “the doctor from Delhi” [as if we can all ignore it] and claims the issue is being raised by “anti-vaccine” proponents. It does not address properly the safety of children nor does it contain any proper overview of the real risks of disease for children against the risks of vaccines nor why there are real causes for concern.

There is clearly an intentional bias. Criticising the original edition of this CHS article, prior to this revision to review Popple’s report, Popple states:

The doctor who analyzed the data did not state that there was no room for argument, though. He did not brazenly state that the hexavalent Infanrix vaccine causes sudden death in babies.

It may not have been “brazen” as Popple writes emotionally, but it does look like he did and Popple knows that. She wrote earlier in the article that the doctor stated:

this demonstrates a link between the vaccination event and the sudden deaths.”

Dawn Popple does not question whether the information GSK provided is reliable and downplays the way GSK disguised the clustering of deaths around the time of vaccination stating, as if it were the wrong approach [emphasis added]:

Rather than compounding the total deaths each day, as in the documents found online, the pediatrics doctor suggests we examine how many more deaths happened right after the vaccine was given compared to as the days went by. He said this demonstrates a link between the vaccination event and the sudden deaths.

A substantial omission from Dawn Popple’s article is she does not discuss that GSK has been caught, found guilty of and fined substantial sums of money for serious misconduct including paying up with the largest health fraud settlement in US history. But Dawn Popple takes as true what GSK says compared to a doctor who with courage has reported publicly this problem with vaccine caused sudden deaths which GSK kept secret and reported in a disguised manner to the safety regulators.

CHS has reported on GSK’s problems with fraud and the like before. Here is an example:

GSK Fined US$3 BILLION – largest health fraud settlement in U.S. history

Remarkably, Popple claims this CHS article is by “an anti-vaccine advocate from Child Health Safety“. She has no information to support such a spurious claim and when CHS is pro-safety, democracy and informed and free choice. Popple it would seem is against.

Absent from the report is the issue that parents are told vaccines are entirely safe when they are not. Also absent from the report is the fact that vaccines are given to children the majority of whom especially in the western world are highly unlikely to suffer serious adverse effects of disease.

In other words normal healthy children are being given vaccines which can kill some of them who may never have a problem from the childhood diseases concerned, even if they caught them.

The report also fails to address the fact that no effective treatments for basic well-known longstanding childhood diseases have been developed. That is a scandal in the scientific 21st Century. If there were effective treatments vaccines would not be needed.

So not only will the public will not get balanced information, here you can see attacks against the dissemination of information via social media.

With mainstream media reporting about vaccination issues being successfully made a near blackout except for reports promoting vaccines, this article shows how the next targets are likely to be shutting down social media and the internet for people to get information about vaccine issues.

Here from the report is a dubious claim which contradicts and downplays under-reporting of adverse vaccine reactions:

"According to the statistics within the document, even if the doctor from Delhi’s fears are spot on, the risk of sudden death, while existent, would also be exceptionally rare after vaccination with the hexavalent Infanrix vaccine.”

Earlier in the report it refers to adverse vaccine reactions being under-reported but fails to explain how substantially under-reported they are. So the information in the GSK document represents a small fraction of the problems of adverse vaccine reactions.

And interestingly, this article, seemingly reviewing the GSK document and many other publications also has been written in a very short space of time when the material concerned is extensive and would require a very long time to consider it. It also contains no quotes from sources approached by the author, Dawn Popple, to support what she has written including the statements she makes as if of fact and the opinions she expresses [with no medical or scientific qualifications]. That is very poor journalism in our view.

The GSK document is 1271 pages alone. Journalists normally do not have that kind of time. This article is written by someone who describes her work as Independent Outsourced Freelance Writer, Freelance Writer, Social Media Marketer, Graphic Designer, Independent Contractor.

If you were to form the opinion that her publication http://www.inquisitr.com is trash journalism, you might be right and we would agree.


Link to study:
Combined hexavalent diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis-hepatitis B-inactivated poliovirus-Haemophilus influenzae type B vaccine; Infanrix™ hexa: twelve years of experience in Italy.
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2014 Jan;10(1):129-37. doi: 10.4161/hv.26269. Epub 2013 Sep 4.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24004825#cm24004825_8656

GLYPHOSATE POISON BEING FED TO BABIES IN HOSPITALS - GLYPHOSATE DRAWS OUT THE VITAL NUTRIENTS OF ANY LIVING THING IT TOUCHES



Source Article:
Glyphosate detected in feeding tubes given to babies and children with cancer
http://www.naturalnews.com/048288_glyphosate_feeding_tubes_cancer_babies.html

(NaturalNews) An unthinkable, (although not entirely surprising), discovery has been made by a group called "Moms Across America," a coalition of mothers fighting to raise awareness and support regarding the dangers of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and their associated pesticides.

Thanks to contributions provided by sponsors and private citizens, Moms Across America funded an experiment that tested feeding tube liquid used in a pediatric rehabilitation hospital where one of the group's supporters is employed.

To say the findings are alarming would be a severe understatement.

According to the results, 6 out of 20 (30 percent) samples of Pediasure, a supposed "nutritional" drink given to ill children in the pediatric unit, tested positive for unsafe levels of glyphosate.

Remember, glyphosate is the primary ingredient found in Monsanto's Roundup, and is also the most widely used weedkiller in the U.S. Glyphosate application has more than doubled in recent times, increasing from around 90 million pounds in 2001 to 185 million in 2007, according to statistics provided by the Pesticide Action Network (PAN).

The pesticide has been linked to toxicity in humans, resulting in cancer, reproductive and developmental complications and neurotoxicity. It's also been directly linked to non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, as well as other serious health effects.


Moms Across America reports that Microbe Inotech, a lab in St. Louis, Missouri, tested Pediasure samples from the same batch, detecting glyphosate levels above 75 parts per billion (ppb) at 800 to 1,110 times higher than has previously been proven to destroy gut bacteria in chickens, or 0.1 ppb. Another study found that 50 parts per trillion (ppt) induced liver, kidney and sex hormone changes in rats.

"These samples were sent by a Moms Across America supporter.This [sic] is the exact brand used in the pediatric rehabilitation hospital where she worked and was fed patients needing tube feeding in critical care," reports a blog post by the group.

The post continues:

Moms Across America finds it appalling that our health care providers have been led to believe this feeding tube liquid is safe. Our children and loved ones who are depending on our health institutions to support their immune system and recovery. Instead they are being fed a liquid which scientists and knowledgeable care givers now believe is doing the exact opposite.

The Pediasure Enteral Nutritional Drink tested is loaded with GM corn syrup, soy, and sugar, which have been shown to cause inflammation, and are sprayed with gyphosate [sic] during the growing season and at harvest as a drying agent.


Glyphosate "draws out the vital nutrients of any living thing it touches"

The harm caused by glyphosate seems endless, as the chemical routinely disrupts most living processes. Studies conclude that Roundup -- in various forms -- acts as an endocrine disruptor, responsible for declining male reproductive health and sperm counts, according to GMFreeCymru.org. The rise in autism has also been attributed to increases in glyphosate application.

Food activists react

The controversial detection of glyphosate in feeding tubes being administered to sick children has many outraged. One popular food activist, Vani Hari, also known as "Food Babe," expressed her disgust in a comment on the group's findings.

This report is absolutely ground breaking for parents everywhere. We need to keep our children safe from these toxic chemicals. Our regulatory agencies have failed us and have let Roundup be carelessly used for too long. The worse part? The American public doesn't have the right to know which food doesn't have it. This must stop and is reason enough to avoid the use of any GMO technology that is tied to this chemical. -- Vani Hari, Food Babe

Sources:

http://www.beyondpesticides.org

http://www.panna.org

http://www.epa.gov[PDF]

http://www.momsacrossamerica.com

https://d3n8a8pro7vhmx.cloudfront.net[PDF]

http://www.gmfreecymru.org

http://science.naturalnews.com

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/048288_glyphosate_feeding_tubes_cancer_babies.html#ixzz3P3H34j83


Friday, January 16, 2015

CIRCUMCISION ASSOCIATED WITH A 46% INCREASED RISK OF AUTISM -- LINKED TO ADHD TOO



Source Article:
Circumcision could raise the risk of autism
http://www.examiner.com/article/circumcision-could-raise-the-risk-of-autism

Circumcision before age five could double the risk

Research published in the the Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine suggests that boys who undergo ritual circumcision may run a greater risk of developing autism before the age of 10 however, some experts disagree with these findings.
GoogleImages/www.fahadan.org

Approximately 55 percent to 65 percent of all newborn boys are circumcised in the United States each year. Routine circumcision is usually performed during the first 10 days (often within the first 48 hours), either in the hospital or, for some religious ritual circumcisions, at home.

Based on converging observations in animal, clinical and ecological studies, Dr. Morten Frisch, MD, PhD, DSc, consultant and senior investigator conducting epidemiological research at Statens Serum Institute, Adjunct professor of sexual health epidemiology at Aalborg University and lead author of this study along with Jacob Simonsen, Center for Sexology Research, Aalborg University, hypothesized a possible impact of ritual circumcision on the subsequent risk of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in young boys.

This study included 342,877 boys born between 1994 and 2003 and followed through the age of nine, and during the course of the study.

During the course of the study 4.986 of autism were diagnosed. The study showed that regardless of cultural background circumcised boys were more likely to develop autism. Being circumcised before age 10 was associated to a 46 percent increased risk But if circumcision took place before the age of five it doubled the risk.

Circumcised boys in non-Muslim families were also more likely to develop hyperkinetic disorder by 81 percent.

Dr. Frisch stated "Our investigation was prompted by the combination of recent animal findings linking a single painful injury to lifelong deficits in stress response and a study showing a strong, positive correlation between a country's neonatal male circumcision rate and its prevalence of ASD in boys."

Today it is considered unacceptable practice to circumcise boys without proper pain relief but none of the most common interventions used to reduce circumcision pain completely eliminates it and some boys will endure strongly painful circumcisions. The researchers say that the pain associated with circumcision in very young babies is likely to be more severe during the operation and post-operatively.

Painful experiences in neonates have been shown in animal and human studies to be associated with long-term alterations in pain perception, a characteristic often encountered among children with ASD.

Possible mechanisms linking early life pain and stress to an increased risk of neurodevelopmental, behavioral or psychological problems in later life remain incompletely conceptualized," said Dr. Frisch. "Given the widespread practice of non-therapeutic circumcision in infancy and childhood around the world, our findings should prompt other researchers to examine the possibility that circumcision trauma in infancy or early childhood might carry an increased risk of serious neurodevelopmental and psychological consequences."

There are experts however, that are urging caution about this study.

Professor Jeremy Turk. MD, BSc (Hons), FRCPsych, FRCPCH, DCH, Consultant Child and Adolescent Psychiatrist in the Trust’s Behavioural Phenotype Learning Disabilities Service and a Professor of Developmental Psychiatry at the Institute of Psychiatry, related to the Daily Mail that while the findings of the study were “interesting,” they needed to be “considered carefully.”

“This is not a causal study, but instead compares data sets and looks for correlations. While this is a valid way of doing a study, it means that we must be careful about any implications,” he said. “For example, many cases of autism are missed until children are older and as there are relatively few cases of autism this could easily skew the data.”

'Furthermore, there are many potentially confounding variables which could explain raised ASD rates, which the authors do not explore or account for.

'Finally, I have some issues with the premise in that their speculations regarding early pain as a cause of autism are, to say the least, highly speculative.

Dr. Rosa Hoekstra, PhD, is a lecturer in The Open University's Science faculty had commented to the Daily Mail ‘I think this is an extremely speculative study. “She related that the study is based on registered data “and takes a registered autism diagnosis at face value, without considering cultural or social factors affecting the likelihood of an (early) autism diagnosis. “Even in a high income country like Denmark not all children with autism are detected and given a suitable autism diagnosis at an early age.”

Professor McConway, professor of applied statistics also with the Open University adds 'This study raises an interesting question, but one that cannot be fully answered with these data.'

Citations

Ritual circumcision and risk of autism spectrum disorder in 0- to 9-year-old boys: national cohort study in Denmark. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 2015; DOI: 10.1177/0141076814565942