Tuesday, August 19, 2014

THAT OLD BLACK MAGIC: LUCIFERIAN SPELLS AND THE JFK ASSASSINATION -- PREDICTIVE PROGRAMMING COURTESY OF HIGH ADEPT SATANISTS

The assassination of John F. Kennedy placed a dark cloud over the psyche of many Americans. Those who previously believed in the superiority, safety, and general goodness of America had to suddenly contemplate the possibility that serious evil lurked in their midst. And indeed, this evil was (and still is) very real.

Below you will find an excerpt from Kerth Barker's second book that describes a satanic ritual he attended as a child. This ritual -- which was being duplicated by satanists in various locations around the world -- was being held for the express purpose of programming the matrix in preparation for the murder of JFK. The satanists conjured up the thought to ritualistically murder JFK, and with the help of their other-worldly demonic assistants, they carried out their satanic ritual with great precision and finesse. They then mind-controlled the masses to believe Kennedy was killed by a lone, crazed gunmen -- in the same way they mind-controlled the masses to believe that 9-11 was the result of an Arab attack against the US.

It's all smoke and mirrors my friends, brilliantly orchestrated by masters of illusion who use sleight of hand and media manipulation to control people's minds.

Please read Kerth Barker's books, which you can find here and help lift the veil on this evil regime. It is time for their satanic system to collapse.

Excerpt from Cannibalism, Blood Drinking and High Adept Satanism, by Kerth Barker.
"When I was nine years old, I was taken to an event while I was in the mode of being Kathy. This was at the home of a wealthy Luciferian woman, I think that it may have been Bob’s mother. There were dozens of Luciferians there. Everyone was wearing masks except for me and two other children. I was wearing a black girl’s dress and slippers. The other children were dressed in black, and so was everyone else. I remember that we were all dressed in black, as if we were attending a funeral.

We gathered in the living room of this mansion. We sat in chairs in a big circle. I may have been slightly drugged at that time because I felt tired. The other children acted sedated as well. But I was awake and so were they.

We had been told we were going to witness an event of great power and importance. At one end of the room was a picture of then President Kennedy. Surrounding his picture was a funeral wreath. All this took place in late October or early November in 1963.

Throughout the duration of this event, the song Old Black Magic was played over and over again.

It’s that song that starts with these lyrics, “That Old Black Magic has me in its spell, that Old Black Magic that you weave so well.”

This Luciferian event went on for about forty minutes. There were several things going on at the same time. A woman was reading something in a foreign language from a scroll. She read it over and over in a somber voice.

Meanwhile, the adults were chanting something that sounded like, “el-lik ton el-lahs uo-hot.”

I think that they were chanting “Thou shall not kill,” backwards. Whatever it was, this chant had been played on a tape recorder for a while, and then they began to mimic what they heard on the tape recorder. They just chanted this in a somber voice over and over. Everyone seemed very serious.

So these three things were going on at once: a woman repeatedly reading something out loud in a language I didn’t understand, dozens of people chanting “Thou shall not kill,” backwards over and over and a recording of the song Old Black Magic playing over and over.

When I was a child, I didn’t understand the event at all really. But it wasn’t too long after that when JFK was killed. And I remember that when I heard the news of his death, I didn’t feel surprised at all. Everyone else was shocked, but to me it felt as if it had already happened earlier.

When my family talked about the assassination over dinner that night, I remember that I said, “I thought he died weeks ago.”
My family got angry at me for saying that, and so I tried to put the whole thing out of my mind. At that time in my life that was the only way which I could deal with the ritual abuse: I just blocked it out.

Now, when I think of the film which shows President Kennedy’s execution, I automatically hear the Old Black Magic song as if it were a soundtrack.

When I think of Kennedy’s head exploding from the bullet and his body falling, I hear the words from that song, “down and down I go, ‘round and ‘round I go.”

What I have come to realize now, many years later, was that the woman reading from the scroll in a foreign language was a High-Adept Satanist. She was programming the minds of the people there to visualize and psychically cause the death of President Kennedy. Every time they were chanting “Thou shall not kill,” backwards, they were psychically involving themselves in his murder. And throughout the playing of the popular song, Old Black Magic, the High-Adept Psychic was programming the minds of the general public to accept this event.

As a nine-year-old child I didn’t understand what I was witnessing that day, but I do remember that Bob told me that meetings similar to the one we attended were being held at exactly the same time in other cities around the country and around the world. And I would not be surprised to learn that these ritualistic events were mirrored by demonic events on other worlds..."

Source Article:
The Hidden Life of the Kennedys : The Elite Dynasty That Got Decimated (Pt. III)
http://vigilantcitizen.com/vigilantreport/hidden-life-kennedys-elite-dynasty-got-decimated-pt-iii/


The death of John F. Kennedy is the most obvious conspiracy of American history. The killing of his brother Robert F. Kennedy was carried out by a man who admitted to being a mind-controlled slave. “John John”, JFK’s insanely popular son died in a mysterious plane crash. Was the “Kennedy curse” actually a way of removing the Kennedys from the power?

This is the third and final part of the series of articles on the Kennedys. It is suggested that you read the first and second parts first.

As discussed in the second part of the series, John F. Kennedy’s short presidency was filled with confrontations with powerful groups including the Federal Reserve, the CIA, and big oil companies. Many of Kennedy’s moves appear to have been conscious efforts to bring power and influence back into the hands of a democratically elected government, out of the hands of the elite acting as a hidden government.

The Kennedy family, an American dynasty with rapidly growing wealth and power, had the potential and the popular support to stay in power in Washington for a long time. However, a long list of strange deaths and strange events continually impeded the Kennedys’ reign in America. The infamous “Kennedy curse” on America’s Royal family includes many mysterious assassinations and suspicious “accidents”, but the most infamous of them all is JFK’s assassination.


JFK Shot by a Patsy

John F. Kennedy was assassinated in Dallas, Texas, at 12:30pm on Friday, November 22, 1963. He was shot once in the throat, once in the upper back and once to the head. Lee Harvey Oswald, an employee of the Texas School Book Depository from which the shots were suspected to have been fired was arrested and charged with the murder. Oswald denied shooting anyone and claimed he was a patsy. Here’s a short video of him claiming he was a patsy:


Lee Oswald Claiming Innocence
http://youtu.be/_ZYAIiErTNg


After the JFK’s death, the Warren Commission was setup by Kennedy’s successor, Lyndon B. Johnson, to investigate the assassination. It is important to note that Johnson has continually opposed many of Kennedy’s key policies and that he quickly reversed many of them upon taking office. Additionally, one of the main figures of the Commission, Allen Dulles, was an ex-CIA chief who had been fired by JFK. Partly for these reasons, the credibility and the conclusions of the Warren Commission are still highly contested today.

The Commission concluded that JFK’s assassin was Lee Harvey Oswald, a lone gunman with psychological issues, who also happened to be a Communist.

It is apparent, however, that Oswald was moved by an overriding hostility to his environment. He does not appear to have been able to establish meaningful relationships with other people. He was perpetually discontented with the world around him. Long before the assassination he expressed his hatred for American society and acted in protest against it. Oswald’s search for what he conceived to be the perfect society was doomed from the start. He sought for himself a place in history—a role as the “great man” who would be recognized as having been in advance of his times. His commitment to Marxism and communism appears to have been another important factor in his motivation. He also had demonstrated a capacity to act decisively and without regard to the consequences when such action would further his aims of the moment. Out of these and the many other factors which may have molded the character of Lee Harvey Oswald there emerged a man capable of assassinating President Kennedy.
- Warren Commission Report, Chapter 7: Unanswered Questions


Oswald’s past is extremely murky and some aspects of it might be pure fabrication. In the years prior to the assassination, the Commission established he held several low-paying jobs, never lasting more than a few months. Nevertheless, he managed to defect from the United States to live in Russia where he learned Russian, before returning to America with a Russian wife. Back in America, Oswald reportedly espoused Marxist views while moving from job to job, and then grabbed a rifle and killed the President of the United States.

In the years following the Warren Commission, new information surfaced about Oswald, much of which points to him actually being a government agent. Several sources revealed that Oswald was in constant contact with FBI and CIA agents. It was even discovered that he operated a “pro-Communist” organization in the same building as government agent offices.

One of Oswald’s Fair Play for Cuba leaflets had the address “544 Camp Street” hand-stamped on it, apparently by Oswald himself. The address was in the “Newman Building” which, from October 1961 to February 1962, housed a militant anti-Castro group, the Cuban Revolutionary Council. Around the corner but located in the same building, with a different entrance, was the address 531 Lafayette Street—the address of “Guy Banister Associates”, a private detective agency run by former FBI agent Guy Banister. Banister’s office was involved in anti-Castro and private investigative activities in the New Orleans area (a CIA file indicated that in September 1960, the CIA had considered “using Guy Banister Associates for the collection of foreign intelligence, but ultimately decided against it”)
- 544 Camp Street and Related Events, House Select Committee on Assassinations – Appendix to Hearings, vol. 10, 13, pp. 123–4.


Oswald was also found to be in contact with Guy Banister’s associate, David Ferrie. According to Victor Marchetti, an Executive Assistant to the Deputy Director of the CIA, Ferrie also had connections to the CIA. Less than a week after the media reported that David Ferrie was being investigated for his links to Lee Harvey Oswald, he was found dead in his apartment under mysterious circumstances.

Like many other elite-controlled patsies, Oswald was “silenced” before he even went to trial. He was shot by a man with mob connections named Jack Ruby (short for Jacob Leon Rubenstein) on his way out from the court.

The legendary picture of Lee Harvey Oswald being shot by Jack Ruby. The event was televised live to millions of viewers.

Ruby’s first explanation for the murder was that Oswald’s death would spare “Mrs. Kennedy the discomfiture of coming back to trial.” However, as time passed, information surfaced hinting that Jack Ruby was actually an agent hired to “terminate” Lee Harvey Oswald because his job as a patsy was done. The House Select Committee, setup in 1976 to investigate the assassinations of both JFK and Martin Luther King, noted that several security breaches allowed Ruby to easily access and shoot Oswald.

The committee was troubled by the apparently unlocked doors along the stairway route and the removal of security guards from the area of the garage nearest the stairway shortly before the shooting … There is also evidence that the Dallas Police Department withheld relevant information from the Warren Commission concerning Ruby’s entry to the scene of the Oswald transfer.

In March 1965, a year after his conviction, Jack Ruby conducted a brief televised news conference in which he stated:

“Everything pertaining to what’s happening has never come to the surface. The world will never know the true facts of what occurred, my motives. The people who had so much to gain, and had such an ulterior motive for putting me in the position I’m in, will never let the true facts come above board to the world.”

When asked by a reporter, “Are these people in very high positions, Jack?”, he responded “Yes.”

According to an article in the London Sunday Times, shortly before he died, Ruby told psychiatrist Werner Teuter that the assassination was “an act of overthrowing the government” and that he knew “who had President Kennedy killed.” He added: “I am doomed. I do not want to die. But I am not insane. I was framed to kill Oswald.”

Ruby died from lung cancer shortly after these statements. According to Dallas Deputy Sheriff Al Maddox, Ruby had suspected that he was injected with cancer cells.

“Ruby told me, he said, ‘Well, they injected me for a cold.’ He said it was cancer cells. That’s what he told me, Ruby did. I said you don’t believe that bullshit. He said, ‘I damn sure do!’ [Then] one day when I started to leave, Ruby shook hands with me and I could feel a piece of paper in his palm… [In this note] he said it was a conspiracy and he said … if you will keep your eyes open and your mouth shut, you’re gonna learn a lot. And that was the last letter I ever got from him.”
Marrs, Jim (1989). Crossfire: The Plot that Killed Kennedy


Although specific details surrounding JFK’s assassination and those involved in it will probably forever remain murky, by stepping back and contemplating the big picture, things can become a little clearer. After decades of new data and revelations, it is fairly obvious from the evidence available that JFK’s assassination was sponsored by high-level figures using patsies to commit the deeds. In the end, every single individual involved with the assassination died shortly after the events.

The true culprits of the assassination, the occult elite, those who run the country through a shadow government, were never even accused. However, several researchers have demonstrated that JFK’s death was more than a political assassination: It was an occult ritual meant to solidify the occult elite’s power, to traumatize the masses and mark a new era of American history.


The Killing of the King

When we look at JFK’s assassination through the eyes of occult secret societies – who attach enormous importance to ritual, symbolism and numerology – powerful and undeniable facts stand out. According to occult researchers, JFK’s death was an extreme and wide-scale reenactment of one of Freemasonry’s most important mythology: The killing of Hiram Abiff.

Depiction of Hiram Abiff, sometimes amalgamated with Hiram, King of Tyre, in his coffin surrounded by the three assassins.

In Freemasonry, initiations for the Third Degree involve a ritual drama reenactment of the killing of its most important figure, Hiram Abiff, by three “ruffians”. Like Hiram Abiff, JFK was shot three times – to the throat, to the chest, and to the head. During the initiation of the Third Degree candidates, Masons enact a ritual drama where the candidate plays the role of Hiram Abiff being killed by three ruffians. Here’s a transcript of the ritual.

“Our Grand Master, Hiram Abiff!” exclaims the ruffian; “he is the very man I wanted to see.” [Seizing the candidate by the throat at the same time, and jerking him about with violence.] “Give me the Master Mason’s word or I’ll take your life!” The conductor replies, “I cannot give it now, but if you will wait till the Grand Lodge assembles at Jerusalem, if you are found worthy, you shall then receive it, otherwise you cannot.” The ruffian then gives the candidate a blow with the twenty-four inch gauge across the throat, on which he fled to the west gate, where he was accosted by the second ruffian, Jubelo, with more violence, and on his refusal to comply with his request, he gave him a severe blow with the square across his breast, on which he attempted to make his escape at the east gate, where he was accosted by the third ruffian, Jubelum, with still more violence, and on refusing to comply with his request, the ruffian gave him a violent blow with the common gavel on the forehead, which brought him to the floor; on which one of them exclaimed, “What shall we do? We have killed our Grand Master, Hiram Abiff!”
- William Morgan, Illustrations of Masonry


The shooting took place in Dallas, at Dealey Plaza, just a few miles off of the 33rd degree latitude. This geographical fact is primordial in Masonic symbolism as the 33rd Degree is the highest degree attainable in Scottish Rite Freemasonry. It is most likely for this reason that the nearby river is named the Trinity River.



A 3D view of Dealey Plaza. Its entire design is based on the number 3.


Considered to be the “birthplace of Dallas”, Dealey Plaza features an obelisk (a Masonic monument) topped by the torch of Illumination.


While many believe this obelisk was built in memory of JFK, it is actually a Masonic monument built in 1940.


The plaque at the bottom mentions that Dealey Plaza is the site of Dallas’ first “Fraternal Lodge” which is a Masonic Lodge.

The site of JFK’s killing was therefore extremely significant in Masonic symbolism. It was located at the 33rd latitude, near the Trinity River, in Dealey Plaza – a site adorned with a Masonic obelisk. (Noteworthy fact: The first nuclear bomb exploded exactly on the 33rd latitude.) The location was named Trinity Site … and a Masonic obelisk now identifies the area.

The Trinity Site Obelisk is located at the 33rd latitude.

The Killing of the King rite was accomplished at another Trinity site located approximately ten miles south of the 33rd degree of north parallel latitude between the Trinity River and the Triple Underpass at Dealey Plaza in Dallas, Texas. Dealey Plaza was the site of the first masonic temple in Dallas. In this spot, which had been known during the 19th century cowboy era as “Bloody Elm Street,” the world leader who had become known as the “King of Camelot,” President John Fitzgerald Kennedy, was shot to death.

A widely publicized image which has become perhaps the key symbol of the enigma of the Kennedy hoodwink, emerged immediately in the wake of the assassination: a photograph of three “tramps” in official custody, who were later unexplainably released and never identified, though speculation about who they really were has reached fever pitch among investigators.

This photograph is a ritual accompaniment of the Black mass that was the ceremonial immolation of a king, the unmistakable calling card of masonic murder, the appearance of Jubela, Jubelo and Jubelum, the three “unworthy craftsmen” of Temple burlesque, “that will not be blamed for nothing.” This ritual symbolism is necessary for the accomplishment of what James Shelby Downard and I described in the first edition of Apocalypse Culture, as the alchemical intention of the killing of the ‘King of Camelot’:

“…the ultimate purpose of that assassination was not political or economic but sorcerous: for the control of the dreaming mind and the marshaling of its forces is the omnipotent force in this entire scenario of lies, cruelty and degradation. Something died in the American people on Nov. 22, 1963—call it idealism, innocence or the quest for moral excellence. It is the transformation of human beings which is the authentic reason and motive for the Kennedy murder…”

The seemingly random and senseless slaughter of a President, the week before Thanksgiving, by having his head blown apart in those now infamous Zapruder film frames, is the signpost of humanity’s entry into what David Cronenberg in his Videodrome Rosicrucian cinematic manifesto termed, “Savage New Times.”

The search for the three assassins has become a trip up and down Tim Finnegan’s ladder, a ladder containing “one false step after another.” It is a masonic riddle several magnitudes above the pedestrian, CIA-Mafia-Anti-Castro-Castro-KGB-Texas rightwing etc. etc. political “solutions” pushed by the various books and movies which sometimes only serve to confuse and demoralize us all the more.
- Michael Hoffman III, Secret Societies and Psychological Warfare


It is important to note that some of the most important heads of the Warren Commission, which concluded that JFK’s death was the result of lone gunman Oswald, were high level Freemasons.

It is also interesting to note that Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, Earl Warren, was himself a 33rd degree Freemason, who was Grand Master of California from 1935 to 1936. He was also Potentate of Aahmes Shrine, and an officer in two Scottish Rite Lodges in Oakland, California. He was also a member of the Bohemian Club, and gave several lakeside speeches at Bohemian Grove, which is located north of San Francisco, in the small wooded town Monte Rio, California. His Warren Commission was filled with Freemasons. Gerald R. Ford, J. Edgar Hoover, and Allen Dulles were all 33rd degree Freemasons as well. Abraham Zapruder himself, was a 32nd degree Freemason, and after the assassination, he was raised to the 33rd degree, for his part in the assassination plan. Other high-level Freemasons directly involved in the murder of JFK included Lyndon Baines Johnson and George Bush Sr., both of whom were 33rd degree Freemasons, as well as Bush Sr. belonging to Yale University’s Skull and Bones occult society.
- Kentroversy Papers, “Dealey Plaza: Esoteric Freemasonic Symbolism in the Death of JFK”



The tombstone of JFK is laid next to the Eternal Flame – symbol of the occult elite and its torch of Illumination.


Destroying the Legacy

After JFK’s death, there were still Kennedy family members who had the potential to keep America’s Royal Family in power. The first one was JFK’s brother, Robert F. Kennedy. He had the name, the vision, the experience, and the momentum to easily become U.S. President. However, his ascent to power was cut even shorter than his brother’s.


Robert F. Kennedy

RFK with Martin Luther King.

Although he lived in the shadow of his brother, Robert F. Kennedy (also known as Bobby or RFK) was an important part of JFK’s Presidency. As the 64th U.S. Attorney General, RFK was the President’s closest adviser and exercised widespread authority over every cabinet department. The Associated Press even dubbed him “Washington’s #2 Man”.

A few years after JFK’s assassination, Bobby Kennedy entered the race to become the Presidential candidate of the Democratic party. The themes and policies promoted by RFK were not only a continuation of his brother’s work, they went a step further. RFK stood on a platform of racial and economic justice, non-aggression in foreign policy, decentralization of power and social improvement. He was particularly popular with Black and Native American communities and often spoke of the “disaffected”, the impoverished and the excluded.

On June 5, 1968, just after winning the California Primary, which would secure his ticket to become a Presidential candidate, RFK was shot three times by Sirhan Sirhan, a 24-year-old Palestinian man.

Mugshot of Sirhan Sirhan

Lawrence Teeter, attorney for convicted assassin Sirhan Sirhan, stated that Sirhan was under the influence of hypnosis when he fired his weapon at Robert F. Kennedy in 1968. Teeter even mentioned that Sirhan was a product of the CIA’s MKULTRA program and that mind control techniques were used to control Sirhan. Sirhan’s attorney further added that Sirhan had been hypno-programmed to be a diversion for the real assassin and that Sirhan would be easily blamed for the assassination because he is an Arab. According to court papers :

Sirhan “was an involuntary participant in the crimes being committed because he was subjected to sophisticated hypno programming and memory implantation techniques which rendered him unable to consciously control his thoughts and actions at the time the crimes were being committed.”

Sirhan, now 67 years old, is still behind bars and remains one of the most obvious MK patsies used by the occult elite to carry out its agenda.


John F. Kennedy, Jr.

John F. Kennedy Jr.’s salute to his deceased father is an iconic image that will forever remain engraved in American history.

Americans fell in love with John F. Kennedy Jr. (also known as John-John), when he was a toddler photographed playing under his father’s desk. As a grown man, John-John was a full-fledged celebrity, with the kind of popularity that was only rivaled by the British Royal family. In a short period of time, he singled-handledly rekindled the Kennedy-mania of the 1960s.
During the 1980's and 90's, John John became a popular phenomenon.

During the 1980s and 90s John-John was a American celebrity and sex symbol.

Ambitious, well-spoken, handsome, and comfortable with the spotlight, John-John was identified by many as the man who would bring the Kennedys back to the White House. Several times, Kennedy was asked publicly if he was interested in following in his father’s footsteps and choosing politics as a career; he replied that he was declining to do so for the time being, but would not rule it out for the future. In 1999, Kennedy was seen as a frontrunner for the New York Senate seat vacated by Daniel Patrick Moynihan, the state’s senior senator.

Shortly after this political breakthrough, John-John died in a small plane crash, along with his wife. Many observers stated that the events surrounding the crash were suspect and that there were indications of a cover up. Here’s a 2001 news article describing how important footage and photographs of the plane crash mysteriously “vanished”:

JFK, Jr Air Crash Site Video Footage Vanishes

Video and photographic evidence from the site of the plane crash that killed John F. Kennedy jnr has either been destroyed or mysteriously gone missing as a family court battle looms over the accident.

The US Navy has conceded it destroyed up to eight hours of video footage taken by divers recovering the bodies of Mr Kennedy, his wife, Carolyn Bessette, and her sister, Lauren Bessette, in the waters off the island of Marthas Vineyard in July 1999.

At the same time, a large quantity of photographs has apparently been lost between the navy and the organisation empowered to investigate aircraft accidents, the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB).

The developments have given rise to claims that the Kennedy family used its political influence to have the images destroyed before they could go to a court and become publicly available.

The family already endures frequent rebroadcasting of amateur footage of the assassination of Mr Kennedy’s father, president John F. Kennedy, in a 1963 shooting during a motorcade in Dallas.

Family members did not want to suffer the same pain over John jnr’s death by being subjected to constant replays of graphic footage of the recovery operation.

Navy divers filled four 120-minute VHS cassettes with footage during the operation.

The film included their discovery of Mr Kennedy’s body, wedged from the waist down between the seat and instrument panel of the plane and his arms waving back and forth in the current. It also showed the bodies of Ms Carolyn Bessette and her sister lying crushed and partially obscured behind Mr Kennedy.

A freedom of information application by a United States newspaper seeking access to the film forced the navy to concede at the weekend that it had burned the tapes “out of respect for the family”.

However, the NTSB said it had told the navy it did not need the footage because it had been able to recover almost all the wreckage and determine a cause of the accident from that.

The Bessette family’s lawyers believe the videos would have been crucial to their pending court actions seeking damages from Mr Kennedy’s estate.

The Bessette sisters’ mother, Ms Ann Freeman, and father, Mr William Bessette, are preparing separate suits based on the official finding that the deaths were caused by pilot error on Mr Kennedy’s part.

The Kennedys recently offered Ms Freeman $US10 million ($18.6 million) from Mr John F. Kennedy jnr’s $US100 million estate. The offer was turned down.
- Sydney Morning Herald, Feb 13th 2001


With his tragic death, which stunned and traumatized the masses yet again, hopes for a second-generation Kennedy President evaporated.


The Kennedy Curse

Below is a list of the main events considered to be part of the “Kennedy Curse”. While it is unlikely that every single one of these events was a result of a conspiracy against the family, it is difficult to ignore the strong pattern of synchronicity, aka “meaningful coincidences”, associated with the Kennedys.

1941—Rosemary Kennedy was often believed to have been mentally challenged. Some sources have claimed she was suffering from mental illness, such as depression and schizophrenia. Because of her increasingly violent and severe mood swings, her father, Joe, Sr., arranged in secret for her to undergo a lobotomy. The lobotomy instead further impaired her cognitive abilities, and as a result, Rosemary remained institutionalized until her death in 2005.

August 12, 1944—Joseph P. Kennedy, Jr. died when his plane exploded over East Suffolk, England, as part of Project Anvil.

May 13, 1948—Kathleen Cavendish, Marchioness of Hartington, died in a plane crash in France.

August 23, 1956—Jacqueline Bouvier Kennedy gave birth to a stillborn daughter, Arabella.(Although she is buried at Arlington National Cemetery next to her parents with a marker reading “Daughter”, her parents had intended to name her Arabella.)

August 9, 1963—Patrick Bouvier Kennedy died two days after his premature birth.

November 22, 1963—U.S. President John F. Kennedy was assassinated in Dallas, Texas. Lee Harvey Oswald was charged with the crime, but was shot and killed by Jack Ruby two days later before a trial could take place. The FBI and the Warren Commission officially concluded that Oswald was the lone assassin. However, the United States House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA) concluded that those investigations were seriously flawed and that Kennedy was probably assassinated as the result of a conspiracy.

June 19, 1964—U.S. Senator Edward M. “Ted” Kennedy was involved in a plane crash in which one of his aides and the pilot were killed. He was pulled from the wreckage by fellow senator Birch E. Bayh II and spent weeks in a hospital recovering from a broken back, a punctured lung, broken ribs, and internal bleeding.

June 5, 1968—U.S. Senator Robert F. Kennedy was assassinated by Sirhan Bishara Sirhan in Los Angeles immediately following his victory in the California Democratic presidential primary. Sirhan was convicted of Kennedy’s murder and is serving a life sentence at the Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility.

July 18, 1969—In the Chappaquiddick incident, Ted Kennedy accidentally drove his car off a bridge on Chappaquiddick Island, which fatally trapped his passenger, Mary Jo Kopechne, inside. In his July 25 televised statement, Kennedy stated that on the night of the incident he wondered “whether some awful curse did actually hang over all the Kennedys.”

August 13, 1973—Joseph P. Kennedy II was the driver of a car which crashed and left his passenger, Pam Kelley, paralyzed.

April 25, 1984—David Anthony Kennedy died of a cocaine and Demerol overdose in a Palm Beach, Florida hotel room.

December 31, 1997—Michael LeMoyne Kennedy died in a skiing accident in Aspen, Colorado. Kennedy was suspected of statutory rape after having a three-year affair with a 14-year-old baby sitter.

July 16, 1999—John F. Kennedy, Jr. died when the Piper Saratoga light aircraft he was piloting crashed into the Atlantic Ocean off the coast of Martha’s Vineyard due to pilot error. His wife and sister-in-law were also killed.

- Wikipedia, “Kennedy Curse”

In Conclusion

This series on the Kennedys retraced the dynasty’s rise to power, its political direction, its immense popularity, and its violent downfall. Revisiting the rise and fall of this powerful family also reveals many key characteristics of the occult elite, its modus operandi, and the extent of its power. By learning the truth about the Kennedys, we can see how the occult elite uses patsies and mind-controlled assassins to carry out murders; controls and influences law enforcement, politicians, and federal commissions; and manipulates media to confuse the masses. And we can see how the occult elite continue to operate in the shadows, as they has for centuries.

Why did the occult elite destroy the Kennedy family? Were they outsiders in the closed circle of elite bloodlines? Was their ascent to power an accident that was not supposed to happen? Did the Kennedys turn against their puppetmasters and try to bring their own style of governing?

Whatever the case may be, the true antagonism between the Kennedy family and those who decimated them is happening on a higher level. Despite their flaws, there was something about the Kennedys that brought light, hope and warmth to the masses. In this sense, they represented the exact opposite of the occult elite who develop darkness, despair and cruelty. For this reason, the Kennedys – along with so many others who have brought light and hope to the masses – were killed.

Today, all that remains of the Kennedy dynasty is the Eternal Flame of JFK’s grave, a source of light that actually represents the darkness of those in power.

THE SECRET BEHIND THE JEWISH QUESTION - CIRCUMCISION - TRAUMA-BASED MIND-CONTROL - 4 PART YOUTUBE SERIES

This is a fascinating interview with a jewish intellectual who ponders with great insight the psychopathy of the jewish people and the impact this psychopathy has had worldwide. The videos are in French with English subtitles. Enjoy.
"...And to be able to win in one operation 500 billion francs, and crash the bank of England with one phone call, you have to be a jew... I found the origin of this jewish speculation -- this speculative-parasitic mind, jewish of course, which for 5,000 years... has weighed down on the entire planet; it's the 8th day circumcision which we'll talk about...

On what do we blame, or can we blame, objectively, the jewish mindset?

Well, you know in the commentary of the Torah, it is written that circumcision is something that goes beyond human understanding -- that you shouldn't try to understand. I read it myself in the commentary of the Torah, so I say this knowingly. Well, that's not the case anymore. Now we know. And we know -- well I know and some people know -- Albert Camus knew... and Dr. Gautier who figured it out of course knew better than me, some philosophers like Gustave Thibon etc. know. But the masses ignore it, and the jews are totally unaware -- their ordeal - because it's an ordeal they live through - You know, to torment and to kill others, it's also hell for them, it's a disease. You know Neitzsche said 'it was the sick who invented malice.' Consequently these are people you need to cure, and to cure the jews it's very simple: radical suppression of the 8th day circumcision. And we're going to enter the heart of the issue... Well there is, for the jews, an operation you get done on the 8th day after birth, it's called circumcision. Now on the 8th day after birth, begins - as Dr. Jean Gautier has shown -- the first puberty. This puberty lasts 21 days. It's going to last 21 days starting on the 8th day. And it's on the 8th day that circumcision is practiced. As a result, the first puberty, which is a major event, is going to be disturbed... [T]his operation affects the jewish psyche and endocrine system... What happens is when you perform this operation, you set free some hormones contained in the internal genital organ, which is THE human gland. The gland that basically runs everything deliberately. Deliberately not automatically... so it's the organ of free will. It will consequently become underdeveloped starting that day... It will be underdeveloped and at the same time it will liberate other organs, which will run without the breaks on. Because the role of the internal genital gland is precisely to orchestrate a balance in the whole hormonal system. It won't be able to do it. Thus the pituitary and the thyroid, even the adrenal glands to a lesser extent, will become unhinged. They will therefore be out of control - 7, 8, or 10 times more active than in most humans. And what's going to happen? The internal genital gland, which is underdeveloped in the mentally ill, will be underdeveloped in the jews. Which means they'll only have enough interstitial capacity to direct their speculations which will be dictated by their pituitary and their thyroid. Hence a sort of real illness: they can't stop... [W]hat's switched off is the potential to control their speculation... And you come to these monstrosities that are financial capitalism, marxism and freudianism. So then... the hormones will fixate either upon the reproductive genital gland, which will make the jews sex fiends, womanizers...

So the jews would have a satanic mission... with the obligation to not understand the tragedy of circumcision...through denial if need be. To reach the end of their satanic path... They are hence compelled to pursue this horrible analytical path until the end, and to impose it on humanity as a whole, and unfortunately they're buying into it without any resistance. That's how you can understand the jewish question on a metaphysical level -- basically, they are innocents, miserable, who suffer the consequences of an unfortunate operation, giving them an absolutely fixed mentality which makes them great financeers, I mean the ones who run the world, they are also jewish... the Jews who run the world, they have the mindset because of the circumcision, and they cannot escape it.... So this circumcision is, therefore the key...

I can't find a word derogatory enough to fit the holocaust story. It's really the most fantastic deception. And when I say deception, filthy, revolting deception - that history ever presented to us. There's another one. It's the famed flight from Egypt. We've been made to believe they fled Egypt and the Pharaoh didn't want to let them leave. Actually it's the exact opposite... Moses, who was convicted with murder but hadn't been executed because he was ranked a prince and he was made to come back to deal with these people and take them elsewhere. That was the first lie. So it started with the first lie, you see, and it ended with the holocaust. So, enormous lie. Elementary graduation level lie. Yes. It's very simple. 6 million. Start with 6 million. 6 million is country like Switzerland. You see the size of Switzerland right? ... Imagine the dimensions of Auschwitz concentration camp since it happened in Auschwitz supposedly. It doesn't hold water... There's no room for those 6 million. That's the first thing. Then if 6 million had to be exterminated, there would be ashes. Thousands of tons of them. Because millions of people -- that's quite an amount of ashes... Now these ashes, if they'd been gassed, there would automatically be traces of hydrogen cyanide. Ashes were never found. Ashes were never analyzed. Hydrogen cyanide was never found... These gas chambers were supposedly adjoined to the crematoriums. Zyklon-b is a hyperflammable and explosive gas. Imagine for a second a gas chamber next to a crematorium. It would make some pretty fireworks.
-- Roger Dommergue Polacco de Menasce, Entretien avec le professeur




The Secret Behind The Jewish Question -Circumcision- Trauma Based Mind Control 1 of 4
http://youtu.be/rJ17CZnR8SM




The Secret Behind The Jewish Question -Circumcision- Trauma Based Mind Control 2 of 4
http://youtu.be/WWplHgJD4D8




The Secret Behind The Jewish Question -Circumcision- Trauma Based Mind Control 3 of 4
http://youtu.be/D3l4gdyCbCY




Roger Dommergue - Interview 4-4
http://youtu.be/b3JVQQcQylo?list=PL2DA3A88B18F4E135

FORD, ROCKEFELLER, CARNEGIE AND GUGGENHEIM -- FOUNDATIONS BENT ON CREATING COMMUNISIM IN AMERICA AND TAKING OVER THE WORLD


Norman Dodd On Tax Exempt Foundations
http://youtu.be/YUYCBfmIcHM


This is a very interesting interview that reveals a huge conspiracy being conducted against the US by four major tax-exempt foundations including Carnegie, Rockefeller, Ford, and Guggnehiem -- all of them Zionist organizations bent on creating monopolies and world domination. A full transcription of the interview is below. Please listen to the whole video or read the entire transcript. This is extremely educational and informative.
"What we were able to bring forward was -- what we had uncovered was -- the determination of these large endowed foundations, through their trustees, actually to get control over the content of American education....

Alan Gaither was, at that time, President of the Ford Foundation. Mr. Gaither had sent for me when I found it convenient to be in New York, asked me to call upon him at his office, which I did. On arrival, after a few amenities, Mr. Gaither said, "Mr. Dodd, we have asked you to come up here today because we thought that, possibly, off the record, you would tell us why the Congress is interested in the activities of foundations such as ourselves." Before I could think of how I would reply to that statement, Mr. Gaither then went on to say, "Mr. Dodd, all of us who have a hand in the making of policies here, have had experience operating under directives, the substance of which is, that we use our grant-making power so as to alter life in the United States that it can be comfortably merged with the Soviet Union....

We are now at the year nineteen hundred and eight, which was the year that the Carnegie Foundation began operations. And, in that year, the trustees meeting, for the first time, raised a specific question, which they discussed throughout the balance of the year, in a very learned fashion. And the question is this: Is there any means known more effective than war, assuming you wish to alter the life of an entire people? And they conclude that, no more effective means to that end is known to humanity, than war. So then, in 1909, they raise the second question, and discuss it, namely, how do we involve the United States in a war?

Well, I doubt, at that time, if there was any subject more removed from the thinking of most of the People of this country, than its involvement in a war. There were intermittent shows in the Balkans, but I doubt very much if many people even knew where the Balkans were. And finally, they answer that question as follows: we must control the State Department.

And then, that very naturally raises the question of how do we do that? They answer it by saying, we must take over and control the diplomatic machinery of this country and, finally, they resolve to aim at that as an objective. Then, time passes, and we are eventually in a war, which would be World War I. At that time, they record on their minutes a shocking report in which they dispatch to President Wilson a telegram cautioning him to see that the war does not end too quickly. And finally, of course, the war is over.

At that time, their interest shifts over to preventing what they call a reversion of life in the United States to what it was prior to 1914, when World War I broke out. At that point, they come to the conclusion that, to prevent a reversion, we must control education in the United States. And they realize that is a pretty big task. To them it is too big for them alone.

So they approach the Rockefeller Foundation with a suggestion: that portion of education which could be considered domestic should be handled by the Rockefeller Foundation, and that portion which is international should be handled by the Endowment.

They then decide that the key to the success of these two operations lay in the alteration of the teaching of American History. So, they approach four of the then most prominent teachers of American History in the country -- people like Charles and Mary Byrd. Their suggestion to them is this, “Will they alter the manner in which they present their subject”” And, they get turned down, flatly.

So, they then decide that it is necessary for them to do as they say, i.e. “build our own stable of historians." Then, they approach the Guggenheim Foundation, which specializes in fellowships, and say” “When we find young men in the process of studying for doctorates in the field of American History, and we feel that they are the right caliber, will you grant them fellowships on our say so? And the answer is, “Yes.”

So, under that condition, eventually they assemble twenty (20), and they take these twenty potential teachers of American History to London. There, they are briefed in what is expected of them -- when, as, and if they secure appointments in keeping with the doctorates they will have earned.

That group of twenty historians ultimately becomes the nucleus of the American Historical Association. And then, toward the end of the 1920's, the Endowment grants to the American Historical Association four hundred thousand dollars ($400,000) for a study of our history in a manner which points to what this country look forward to, in the future.

That culminates in a seven-volume study, the last volume of which is, of course, in essence, a summary of the contents of the other six. The essence of the last volume is this: the future of this country belongs to collectivism, administered with characteristic American efficiency...."
Transcript of Norman Dodd Interview found at http://supremelaw.org/authors/dodd/interview.htm
1982 A.D. with G. Edward Griffin




Warning! You are about to enter the Reality Zone -- a place were truth is stranger than fiction -- where knowledge is king -- where myths are shattered and deception exposed. It is a place where the lessons of history are found, and where true-life adventures reveal the hidden nature of man.



If you proceed, you will not be able to return to the twilight zone from which you came.



You have five seconds remaining to escape.



1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5.



Welcome to the Reality Zone. I am Ed Griffin. The story we are about to hear represents a missing piece in the puzzle of modern history. We are about to hear a man tell us that the major tax-exempt foundations of America, since at least 1945, have been operating to promote a hidden agenda. That agenda has nothing to do with the surface appearance of charity, good works or philanthropy.



This man will tell you that the real objective has been to influence American educational institutions and to control foreign policy agencies of the Federal government. The purpose of the control has been to condition Americans to accept the creation of world government. That government is to be based on the principle of collectivism, which is another way of saying socialism; and, it is to be ruled from behind the scenes by those same interests which control the tax-exempt foundations.



Is this a believable scenario?



Well, the man who tells this story is none other than Mr. Norman Dodd who, in the year 1954, was the staff director of the Congressional Special Committee to investigate tax-exempt foundations -- sometimes referred to as the Reece committee, in recognition of its chairman, Congressman Carroll Reece. I conducted the interview we are about to hear, in 1982. I had no immediate use for the material at that time, but I realized that Mr. Dodd's story was of great importance.



Since he was advanced in age and not in good health, I wanted to capture his recollections on videotape while he was still with us. It was a wise decision, because Mr. Dodd did pass away just a short time afterwards.



In later years there was a resurgence of interest in Mr. Dodd's story, and we released the videotape to the public in 1991. And so, what now follows is the sound track taken from the full, unedited interview, broken occasionally only for a tape change, or to omit the sound of a passing airplane. It stands on its own as an important piece in the puzzle of modern history.





[begin interview]



Griffin: Mr. Dodd, let's begin this interview by a brief statement, for the record, telling us who you are, what your background is, and your qualifications to speak on the subject.



Dodd: Well, Mr. Griffin, as for who I am, I am just as the name implies -- an individual born in New Jersey and educated in private schools, eventually in a school called Andover, Massachusetts, and then Yale University.



And, running through my whole period of being brought up, growing up, I have been an emphaticable [sic] reader, and I have had one major interest and that was this country, as I was led to believe that it was originally founded.



I entered the world of business knowing absolutely nothing about how that world operated. And, I realized that the only way to find out what that world was, and consisted of, would be to become part of it. And I then acquired some experience in the manufacturing world, and in the world of international communications, and finally chose banking as the field I wished to devote my life to.



I was fortunate enough, to secure a position in one of the important banks in New York. I lived there. I lived through the conditions which led up to what is known as the crash of 1929. I witnessed what is tantamount to a collapse of the structure of the United States as a whole.



Much to my surprise, my superiors, in the middle of the panic in which they were immersed, confronted me. I was confronted with the question, "Norm, what do we do now?"



I was thirty at the time, and I had no more right to have an answer to that question than the man in the moon. However, I did manage to say to my superiors, "Gentlemen, you take this experience as proof of something that you do not know about banking." And you better go find out what that something is, and act accordingly.



Four days later, I was confronted by these same superiors, with a statement to the effect that, “Norm, you go find out.” And I really was fool enough to accept that assignment, because it meant that you were going out to search for something, and nobody could tell you what you were looking for. I felt so strongly on the subject that I consented to it.



I was relieved of all normal duties inside the bank and, two and a half years later, I felt that it was possible to report back to those who had given me this assignment. So, I rendered such a report and, as a result of the report I rendered, I was told the following: "Norm, what you are saying is, we should return to sound banking." And I said, “Yes, in essence, that's exactly what it is that I am saying.”



Whereupon, I got my first shock, which was a statement from them to this effect: "We will never see sound banking in the United States again." And they cited chapter and verse, to support that statement.



What they cited was as follows: since the end of WWI, we have been responsible for what they call the institutionalizing of conflicting interests. And they are so prevalent inside this country, that they can never be resolved.



This came to me as an extraordinary shock because the men who made this statement were men who were deemed as the most prominent bankers in the country. The bank of which I was a part was spoken of a Morgan bank. Coming from men of that caliber, a statement of that kind made a tremendous impression on me.



The type of impression that it made on me was this: I wondered if I, as an individual, as what they call a junior officer of the bank, could with the same enthusiasm foster the progress and the policies of the bank. I spent about a year trying to think this out, and came to the conclusion that I would have to resign.



I did resign. As a consequence of that, I had this experience. When my letter of resignation reached the desk of the president of the bank, he sent for me. I came to visit with him and he stated to me, "Norm, I have your letter, but I do not believe you understand what has happened in the last ten days." I said, “No, Mr. Cochran, I have no idea what's happened.”



“Well,” he says, "the directors have never been able to get your report to them out of their minds and, as a result, they have decided that you, as an individual, must begin at once, and you must re-organize this bank in keeping with your own ideas." He then said, "Now, can I tear up your letter?”



And inasmuch as what had been said to me, what he was offering me, at the age of (by then) thirty-three, was about as fine an opportunity for service to the country as I could imagine. I said, “Yes.” And they said they wished me to begin at once, and I did.



Suddenly, in a span of about six weeks, I was not permitted to do another piece of work. And, every time I brought the subject up, I was kind of patted on the back and told, "Stop worrying about it, Norm. Pretty soon you will be a vice-president and you will have quite a handsome salary, and ultimately be able to retire on a very worthwhile pension and, in the meantime, you can play golf and tennis to your hearts content on weekends."



Well, Mr. Griffin, I found I could not do it. I spent a year, figuratively, with my feet on the desk, doing nothing. I just couldn't adjust to it. So I did resign. This time my resignation stuck.



Then, I got my second shock, which was the discovery that the doors of every bank in the United States were closed to me and I never could get a job, as it were, in the bank. So I found myself for the first time since I graduated from college, out of a job.



From then on, I followed various branches of the financial world, ranging from investment counsel, to membership in the stock exchange. I finally ended up as an advisor to a few individuals who had capital funds to look after.



In the meantime, my major interest became very specific, which was to endeavor, by some means, to get the educational world to actually, you might say, teach the subject of economics realistically, and move it away from the support of various speculative activities that characterized our country.



I have had that interest and you know how it is, if you generate a specific interest, you find yourself gravitating toward persons with similar interests. Ultimately, I found myself kind of at the center of the world of dissatisfaction with the direction in which this country was headed. And, I found myself in contact with many individuals who, on their own, had done a vast amount of studying and research in areas which were part of the problem.



Griffin: What point in your career did you become connected with the Reece Committee?



Dodd: Nineteen hundred and fifty-three (1953).



Griffin: 1953. And what was that capacity, Sir?



Dodd: That was in the capacity of what they called “Director of Research.”



Griffin: Can you tell us what the Reece Committee was attempting to do?



Dodd: Yes, I can tell you. It was operating and carrying out instructions embodied in a Resolution passed by the House of Representatives, which was to investigate the activities of foundations as to whether or not these activities could justifiably be labeled “un-American” -- without, I might add, defining what they meant by “un-American.” That was the Resolution and the committee had, then, the task of selecting a counsel, and the counsel, in turn, had the task of selecting a staff; and, he had to have somebody who would direct the work of that staff, and that was what they meant by the “Director of Research. “



Griffin: What were some of the details, the specifics, of what you told the committee at that time?



Dodd: Well, Mr. Griffin, in that report, I specifically -- number one -- defined what was, to us, meant by the phrase “un-American.” And, we defined that, in our way, as being a determination to effect changes in the country by un-Constitutional means.



We have plenty of Constitutional procedures, assuming that we wished to effect a change in the form of government, and that sort of thing. And therefore, any effort in that direction, which did not avail itself of the procedures authorized by the Constitution, could be justifiably called “un-American.” That was the start of educating them, up to that particular point. The next thing was to educate them as to the effect on the country, as a whole, of the activities of large, endowed foundations over the then past forty years.



Griffin: What was that effect, Sir?



Dodd: That affect was to orient our educational system away from support of the principles embodied in the Declaration of Independence, and implemented in the Constitution; and to educate them over to the idea that the task now was to effect an orientation of education away from these briefly stated principles and self-evident truths.



And, that’s what had been the effect of the wealth which constituted the endowments of those foundations -– foundations that had been in existence over the largest portion of the span of fifty years -- and holding them responsible for this change. What we were able to bring forward was -- what we had uncovered was -- the determination of these large endowed foundations, through their trustees, actually to get control over the content of American education.



Griffin: There is quite a bit of publicity given to your conversation with Rowan Gaither. Will you please tell us who he was, and what was that conversation you had with him?



Dodd: Rowan Gaither was, at that time, President of the Ford Foundation. Mr. Gaither had sent for me, when I found it convenient to be in New York. He asked me to call upon him at his office, which I did.



Upon arrival, after a few amenities, Mr. Gaither said, "Mr. Dodd, we have asked you to come up here today, because we thought that, possibly, off the record, you would tell us why the Congress is interested in the activities of foundations such as ourselves."



And, before I could think of how I would reply to that statement, Mr. Gaither then went on, and voluntarily stated, "Mr. Dodd, all of us who have a hand in the making of policies here, have had experience either with the OSS during the war, or with European economic administration after the war. We have had experience operating under directives. The directives emanate, and did emanate, from the White House. Now, we still operate under just such directives. Would you like to know what the substance of these directives is?"



I said, “Yes, Mr. Gaither, I would like very much to know.” Whereupon, he made this statement to me, "Mr. Dodd, we are here to operate in response to similar directives, the substance of which is that we shall use our grant-making power so to alter life in the United States, that it can be comfortably merged with the Soviet Union."



Well, parenthetically, Mr. Griffin, I nearly fell off the chair. I, of course, didn't, but my response to Mr. Gaither then was, “Oh, Mr. Gaither, I can now answer your first question. You've forced the Congress of the United States to spend a hundred and fifty thousand dollars to find our what you have just told me.” I said, “Of course, legally, you're entitled to make grants for this purpose. But, I don't think you're entitled to withhold that information from the People of this country, to whom you're indebted for your tax exemption. So why don't you tell the People of the country just what you told me?” And his answer was, “We would not think of doing any such thing." So, then I said, “Well, Mr. Gaither, obviously, you forced the Congress to spend this money, in order to find out what you just told me.”



Griffin: Mr. Dodd, you have spoken, before, about some interesting things that were discovered by Kathryn Casey at the Carnegie Endowment. Would you tell us that story, please?



Dodd: Sure, glad to, Mr. Griffin. This experience you just referred to, came about in response to a letter which I had written to the Carnegie Endowment Center, National Peace, asking certain questions and gathering certain information.



On the arrival of that letter, Dr. Johnson, who was then President of the Carnegie Endowment, telephoned me and said, "Did you ever come up to New York?" I said, “Yes, I did, more or less each weekend.” And he said, "When you are next here, will you drop in and see us?” Which I did.



And again, on arrival, at the office of the Endowment, I found myself in the presence of Dr. Joseph Johnson, the President, who was the successor to Alger Hiss, two vice-presidents and their own counsel, a partner in the firm -- a fellow by the name of Cromwell. And Dr. Johnson said (again after amenities), "Mr. Dodd, we have your letter. We can answer all those questions, but it would be a great deal of trouble. We have a counter-suggestion. Our counter-suggestion is that, if you can spare a member of your staff for two weeks, and send that member up to New York, we will give to that member a room in the library, and the minute books of this Foundation since its inception. And we think that, whatever you want to find out or that the Congress wants to find out, will be obvious from those minutes."



Well, my first reaction was they had lost their minds. I had a pretty good idea of what those minutes would contain, but I realized that Dr. Johnson had only been in office two years, and the vice-presidents were relatively young men, and counsel also seemed to be a young man. I guessed that, probably, they had never read the minutes themselves.



And so, I said that I had somebody and I would accept their offer. I went back to Washington, and I selected the member of my staff who had been a practicing attorney in Washington. She was on my staff to ensure I did not break any Congressional procedures or rules. In addition to that, she was unsympathetic to the purpose of the investigation. She was a level-headed and very reasonably brilliant, capable lady, and her attitude toward the investigation was this: “What could possibly be wrong with foundations? They do so much good.”



[Start of side 2]



Well, in the face of that sincere conviction of Kathryn's, I went out of my way not to prejudice her in any way, but I did explain to her that she couldn't possibly cover fifty years of handwritten minutes in two weeks. So, she would have to do what we call “spot reading.” I blocked out certain periods of time to concentrate on. Off she went -- to New York. She came back at the end of two weeks, with the following recorded on dictaphone belts.



We are now at the year nineteen hundred and eight, which was the year that the Carnegie Foundation began operations. And, in that year, the trustees meeting, for the first time, raised a specific question, which they discussed throughout the balance of the year, in a very learned fashion. And the question is this: Is there any means known more effective than war, assuming you wish to alter the life of an entire people? And they conclude that, no more effective means to that end is known to humanity, than war. So then, in 1909, they raise the second question, and discuss it, namely, how do we involve the United States in a war?



Well, I doubt, at that time, if there was any subject more removed from the thinking of most of the People of this country, than its involvement in a war. There were intermittent shows in the Balkans, but I doubt very much if many people even knew where the Balkans were. And finally, they answer that question as follows: we must control the State Department.



And then, that very naturally raises the question of how do we do that? They answer it by saying, we must take over and control the diplomatic machinery of this country and, finally, they resolve to aim at that as an objective. Then, time passes, and we are eventually in a war, which would be World War I. At that time, they record on their minutes a shocking report in which they dispatch to President Wilson a telegram cautioning him to see that the war does not end too quickly. And finally, of course, the war is over.



At that time, their interest shifts over to preventing what they call a reversion of life in the United States to what it was prior to 1914, when World War I broke out. At that point, they come to the conclusion that, to prevent a reversion, we must control education in the United States. And they realize that is a pretty big task. To them it is too big for them alone.



So they approach the Rockefeller Foundation with a suggestion: that portion of education which could be considered domestic should be handled by the Rockefeller Foundation, and that portion which is international should be handled by the Endowment.



They then decide that the key to the success of these two operations lay in the alteration of the teaching of American History. So, they approach four of the then most prominent teachers of American History in the country -- people like Charles and Mary Byrd. Their suggestion to them is this, “Will they alter the manner in which they present their subject”” And, they get turned down, flatly.



So, they then decide that it is necessary for them to do as they say, i.e. “build our own stable of historians." Then, they approach the Guggenheim Foundation, which specializes in fellowships, and say” “When we find young men in the process of studying for doctorates in the field of American History, and we feel that they are the right caliber, will you grant them fellowships on our say so? And the answer is, “Yes.”



So, under that condition, eventually they assemble twenty (20), and they take these twenty potential teachers of American History to London. There, they are briefed in what is expected of them -- when, as, and if they secure appointments in keeping with the doctorates they will have earned.



That group of twenty historians ultimately becomes the nucleus of the American Historical Association. And then, toward the end of the 1920's, the Endowment grants to the American Historical Association four hundred thousand dollars ($400,000) for a study of our history in a manner which points to what this country look forward to, in the future.



That culminates in a seven-volume study, the last volume of which is, of course, in essence, a summary of the contents of the other six. The essence of the last volume is this: the future of this country belongs to collectivism, administered with characteristic American efficiency.



That is the story that ultimately grew out of, and of course, was what could have been presented by the members of, this Congressional Committee, and the Congress as a whole, for just exactly what it said. But, they never got to that point!



Griffin: This is the story that emerged from the minutes at the Carnegie Foundation?



Dodd: That's right.



Griffin: And so?



Dodd: It was official to that extent.



Griffin: And Kathryn Casey brought all of these back, in the form of dictated notes, or verbatim readings, of the minutes?



Dodd: On dictaphone belts.



Griffin: Are those in existence today?



Dodd: I don't know. If they are, they're somewhere in the archives, under the control of the Congress, the House of Representatives.



Griffin: How many people actually heard those? Or, were they typed up, transcripts made?



Dodd: No.



Griffin: How many people actually heard those recordings?



Dodd: Three maybe. Myself, my top assistant, and Kathryn. Yeah, I might tell you this experience, as far as its impact on Kathryn Casey is concerned. Well, she was never able to return to her law practice. If it hadn't been for Carroll Reece's ability to tuck her away in a job with the Federal Trade Commission, I don't know what would have happened to Kathryn. Ultimately, she lost her mind as a result of it. It was a terrible shock to her. It is a very rough experience for her to encounter proof of this kind.



Griffin: Mr. Dodd, can you summarize the opposition to the Committee, the Reece Committee, and particularly the efforts to sabotage the Committee?



Dodd: Well, it began right at the start of the week of the operating staff, Mr. Griffin. It began on the day on which the Committee met for the purpose of consenting to, or confirming, my appointment to the position of Director of Research. Thanks to the abstention by the minority members of the Committee from voting, that is, the two Democratic members – that is why, technically, I was unanimously appointed.



Griffin: Wasn't the White House involved in opposition?



Dodd: Not at this particular point, Sir. Mr. Reece ordered Counsel and myself to visit Wayne Hayes. Wayne Hayes was the ranking minority member of the Committee, as a Democrat. So, we -- Kathryn and I -- had to go down to Mr. Hayes’ office, which we did. Mr. Hayes greeted us with the flat statement, directed primarily to me, “I am opposed to this investigation. I regard it as nothing but an effort on the part of Carroll Reece to gain a little prominence. So, I'll do everything I can to see that it fails.” Well, I have a strange personality, in the sense that a challenge of that nature interests me.



Our Counsel withdrew. He went over and sat on the couch in Mr. Reece's office, and pouted. I, sort of, took up this statement by Mr. Hayes as a challenge, and set myself a goal of winning him over to our point of view.



I started by noticing that, on his desk, there was a book. The book was of the type – and there were many in those days -- that would be complaining about the spread of communism, and Hungary. That type of book.



This meant to me that, at least Hayes had read the book. So, I brought up the subject of the spread of the influence of the Soviet World. For two hours, I discussed this with Hayes and, finally, he ended up by rising from his desk and saying, "Norm, if you will carry this investigation toward the goal that you have outlined to me, I will be your biggest supporter."



I said, “Mr. Hayes, I can assure you. I will not double-cross you. Subsequently, Mr. Hayes sent word to me that he was in Bethesda Naval Hospital, with an attack of ulcers. He asked if would I come and see him. Which I did. He then said, "Norm, the only reason I've asked you to come out here is that I just want to hear you say, again you will not double-cross me." I gave him that assurance, and that was the basis of our relationship.



Meanwhile, Counsel took the attitude expressed in these words, “Norm, if you want to waste your time with 'this guy' (as he called him), then you can go ahead and do it, but don't ever ask me to say anything to him, under any conditions, on any subject.”



So, in a sense, that created a deck for me to operate in relation to Hayes, on my own.



As time passed, Hayes offered friendship, which I hesitated to accept because of his vulgarity. I didn't want to get mixed up with him socially, under any conditions.



Well, that was our relationship for about three months. Eventually, I had occasion to add to my staff. As a result of adding to my staff a top-flight intelligence officer, both the Republican National Committee and the White House resorted to stopping me from continuing this investigation in the direction Carroll Reece had personally asked me to go.



Mr. Griffin, that direction was to utilize this investigation to uncover the fact that this country had been the victim of a conspiracy. That was Mr. Reece's conviction. I eventually agreed to carry out that direction.



I explained to Mr. Reece that his own Counsel wouldn't go in that direction. He gave me permission to disregard our own Counsel and to set up an aspect of the investigation outside of our office -- more or less secretly. The Republican National Committee got wind of what I was doing, and they did everything they could to stop me. They appealed to Counsel to stop me. Finally, they resorted to the White House.



Griffin: Was their objection because of what you were doing, or because of the fact that you were doing it outside of the official auspices of the Committee?



Dodd: No. The objection was, as they put it, my devotion to what they called "anti-Semitism." That was a cooked-up idea. In other words, it wasn't true at all. But, any way, that's the way they expressed it.



Griffin: Excuse me. Why?



Dodd: Then they made it stick.



Griffin: Why did they do that? How could they say that?



Dodd: Well, they could say it, Mr. Griffin. But, they had to have something in the way of a rationalization of their decision to do everything they could to stop completion of this investigation, given the direction that it was moving. That direction would have been exposure of this Carnegie Endowment story, and the Ford Foundation, and the Guggenheim, and the Rockefeller Foundation -- all working in harmony toward the control of education in the United States.



Well, to secure the help of the White House in the picture, they got the White House to cause the liaison between the White and the Hill -- a major person -- to go up to Hayes and try to get him, as it were, actively to oppose what the investigation was engaged in.



Hayes, then, very kindly, would listen to this visit from this major person. Then he would call me and say, “Norm, come up to my office. I have a good deal to tell you.”



I would go up. He would tell me he just had a visit from this major person, and he wants me to break up this investigation. So then I said, “Wayne, what did you do? What did you say to him?” He said, “I just told him to get the hell out.” And he did that three times. I got pretty proud of him, in the sense that he was, as it were, backing me up. We finally embarked upon hearings at Hayes’ request. Hayes wanted to get them out of the way, before he went abroad in the summer.



Griffin: Why were the hearings finally terminated? What happened to the Committee?



Dodd: What happened to the Committee, or to the hearings?



Griffin: The hearings.



Dodd: The hearings were terminated. Carroll Reece was up against such a furor in Hayes, through the activity of our own Counsel. Hayes became convinced that he was being double-crossed; and he put on a show in the public hearing room, Mr. Griffin, that was an absolute disgrace. He called Carroll Reece publicly every name in the book.



Mr. Reece took this as proof that he couldn't continue the hearings. He actually invited me to accompany him when he went down to Hayes’ office and, in my presence, with the tears rolling down his face, Hayes apologized to Carroll Reece for all he'd done, and his conduct. He apologized to me. I thought that would be enough, and Carroll would resume. He never did.



Griffin: This charge of anti-Semitism is kind of intriguing to me. What was the basis of that charge? Was there any basis for it at all?



Dodd: The basis used by the Republican National Committee was that the intelligence officer I had taken on my staff -- when I oriented this investigation to the exposure of, and proof of, a conspiracy -- was known to have a book, and that book was deemed to be anti-Semitic. It was childish, but it's what the second-in-command at the Republican National Committee said, and he told me I'd have to dismiss this person from my staff.



Griffin: Who was that person?



Dodd: A Colonel Lee Loraine.



Griffin: Lee Loraine. And what was his book? Do you recall?



Dodd: The book they referred to was called Waters Flowing Eastward. It was a very strong castigation of the Jewish influence in the world.



Griffin: What were some of the other charges made by Mr. Hayes, against Mr. Reece?



Dodd: Just that Mr. Reece was utilizing this investigation for his own prominence inside the House of Representatives. That was the only charge Hayes could think up.



Griffin: How would you describe the motivation of the people who created the foundations -- the big foundations -- in the very beginning? What was their motivation?



Dodd: Their motivation was, well, let's take Mr. Carnegie, as an example. His publicly declared and steadfast interest was to counteract the departure of the colonies from Great Britain. He was devoted just to putting the pieces back together again.



Griffin: Would that have required the collectivism to which they were dedicated?



Dodd: No. No. No. These policies are the foundations' allegiance to these un-American concepts; these policies are all traceable to the transfer of the funds over into the hands of Trustees, Mr. Griffin. Those Trustees were not the men who had a hand in the creation of the wealth that led to the endowment, or the use of that wealth for what we would call public purposes.



Griffin: It was a subversion of the original intent, then?



Dodd: Oh, yes! Completely so. We got into the worlds, traditionally, of bankers and lawyers.



Griffin: How have the purpose and direction of the major foundations changed, over the years, up to the present? What are their purposes and directions today?



Dodd: 100% behind meeting the cost of education, such as it is presented through the schools and colleges of this United States, on the subject of our history -– to prove that our original ideas are no longer practical. The future belongs to collectivistic concepts. There is just no disagreement on this.



Griffin: Why do the foundations generously support communist causes in the United States?



Dodd: Well, because, to them, communism represents a means of developing what we call a monopoly -- as the organization, we'll say, of large-scale industry into an administrable unit.



Griffin: Do they think that they will?



Dodd: They will be the beneficiary of it, yes.





[end interview]





# # #





This is an edited transcript of a program from the Audio Archives of the Reality Zone.



If you are a subscriber to the Audio Archives, you are entitled to make as many duplicate copies as you wish -- to share with your friends.



There is no additional charge for this, as long as you are a subscriber, and the copies are given freely and not sold.



If you would like to become a subscriber, please ask for our free introductory tape, which provides the details.



“Zone” dwellers receive three cassettes each month in an attractive binder, suitable for book shelves.



For more information, please visit our website at URL:



http://www.realityzone.com/



or call our toll free number:



1-800-595-6596.





The Reality Zone is a subsidiary of American Media.



If you wish to obtain a copy of the videotape on which this program is based, call the Reality Zone at our toll-free number and ask for product information. That number again is:



1-800-595-6596



kuanged
3 years ago

I do believe this is happening. I just can't understand, outside of theological reasons, why these elites are so interested in playing God. They already have more wealth than anyone else on earth. They can have such political influence that they write our laws, control our education influence our politicians, even unto war. They already create society in their own image. Do they just want to 'come out' so that they can be worshipped as gods? Is it just that simple? They need to get a life.

BILL GATES AND THE ALS "ICE BUCKET" RITUAL -- SATANISM, BLACK MAGIC, WEATHER WARFARE, AMERICANS BEWARE

Friends, this is a very important video describing how the Illuminati use the media and the power of alphabet/sigil languages to cast spells. In this video, you will learn that during the winter of 2013, Americans were bombarded with information about Edward "SNOWDEN" -- as a way of getting us to repeat over and over again the language of being SNOWED IN. Hence, we had one of the most severe winters on record, with maximum levels of snowfall in various parts of the nation.

Now, with their new ritual programming, they are attempting to leverage our energy once again, by getting us to participate in the creation of another severe winter, this time with serious levels of flooding or hail or tsunamis or tidal waves -- perhaps being directed at New York. And the way they are getting us to help them create that future is through this absurd "Ice Bucket Ritual" -- that so many billionaires have taken the time to model for us on TV.

It isn't everyday you see billionaires taking time out of their busy looting schedules to demonstrate the absurd. Yet here they are all, one after the other, modeling this sick satanic ritual in order to get us to do it too -- and thereby lend our energy toward their destructive creations.

Beware of their upcoming weather warfare plans. Please pass this video on to as many people as possible so that millions of awakened souls will be using their energy to COUNTERACT the evil plans of the dark forces instead of contributing to them.


Bill Gates ALS Ice Bucket Satanic Ritual
http://youtu.be/OJgseE7LBHw



And will you look at this!!!! Just one day after I posted this blog, this video turned up on facebook.


SATANISTS ARRESTED BY ITCCS, CHILD SACRIFICE RITUAL HALTED, POPES FRANCIS AND BENEDICT AND QUEEN ELIZABETH EXPOSED AS MEMBERS OF SATANIC CULT


Kevin Annett: ITCCS takes down Satanic sacrifice. Exposes Cargill,Sinclair Oil,Bishop,McGill
http://youtu.be/iNmxtoN1YyM


Child Sacrifice Aborted; Satanists Arrested; Cargill, Sinclair Executives Implicated
http://truthfrequencyradio.com/child-sacrifice-aborted-satanists-arrested-cargill-sinclair-executives-implicated/

Yesterday two suspected members of the Ninth Circle Satanic Child Sacrifice Cult were arrested during their preparations for what appeared to be a child sacrifice. Evidently the child homicide was to take place on a blood-stained altar in the basement of a residence in the upscale neighborhood of Outremont Montreal Quebec Canada. During an older woman’s arrest she admitted that the child sacrifice was scheduled for midnight and involved executives of America’s Sinclair Oil and food giant Cargill Corporation. According to an officer of the Brussels Belgium ICLCJ Court, their team worked in conjunction with Montreal police to perform the citizens arrests. “This informant claimed that the two children to be used at the Montreal event were held at a separate facility at McGill University,” the ICLCJ Court press release stated, “but she claimed not to know where. She said that the normal procedure was to deliver them in a drugged condition just before the ritual began. The woman said cult members describe themselves as part of the Ninth Circle society and carried tattoos of the Ninth Circle insignia.​”

“Cargill Corporation Executive Kerry Brick is among the suspected Ninth Circle Satanic Child Sacrifice Cult members,” Kevin Annett of the ITCCS said in today’s interview. “Months ago a survivor testified that as a child they were taken to Cargill Corporate Headquarters in Wayzata Minn where they were forced to observe a child sacrifice. From what other eyewitnesses reported to the ICLCJ Court, Ninth Circle members appear to be very influential and able to get away with doing child sacrifices across the globe.”

A security guard at the Montreal private residence showed arresting officers a small sub-basement sound proof chamber that contained a blood-stained stone altar and two small prison cells with wall shackles. An adjoining room held locked cabinets with child pornographic material and articles of children’s clothing. Evidence such as samples of blood, metallic torture devices, ceremonial swords and sophisticated film equipment was photographed and bagged for analysis.

The suspect identified child sacrifice participants as Cargill Corporation Executive Kerry Brick of Wayzata Minnesota and Sinclair Oil Executive Stephen Holding of Sun Valley Idaho. A prior ICLCJ document claimed other Ninth Circle members included Montreal Catholic Archbishop Christian Lepine and a prominent US billionaire. This same influential American businessman has been identified by eyewitnesses as being at Ninth Circle human hunting parties in the Netherlands. Children were stripped naked, raped, hunted down and killed – as were children in an Australian CIA mind control program according to eyewitness Fiona Barnett. Barnett chronicled her experiences in this article.

“Our team restrained all three prisoners, locked down the premises and took videos and samples from the underground chamber,” wrote a member of the arrest team. “We then secured a covert ​perimeter in the neighborhood in ​anticipation of the arrival of the cult participants and their victims. Unfortunately, although we maintained our vigil until well after midnight, ​no-one else arrived at the premises for the rest of that day and evening. We must assume that the participants were somehow alerted to our presence and aborted the ritual.”

Montreal police supported the Ninth Circle member citizens arrests and planned to eventually take charge of the suspects. “The security guard in our custody was released after he proved that he had been retained in a private commercial capacity. The two cult members are being held in our DAU prison facility in Montreal prior to their questioning by the Court Prosecutor and his Canadian affiliates. All samples and film we obtained are in transit to Brussels headquarters for analysis.”

The International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State, which has been prosecuting cases against Ninth Circle Satanic Cult members in the ICLCJ Court since 2011, had called for protests against child sacrifices believed scheduled on Aug. 15 for Reine du Monde Cathedral in Montreal and Pro Cathedral in Dublin Ireland. The Ireland child sacrifice was thought to be under the direction of Catholic Archbishop Dermot Martin. Evidently because of protests, the Montreal child sacrifice was relocated from the Montreal Cathedral sub basement crypt to an underground facility at McGill University, then to the private estate in Outremont Montreal.

McGill University had a history of torturing children in satanic-related mind control experiments. In the early 1950s at McGill, President of the Canadian, American and World Psychiatric Associations D. Ewen Cameron, tortured children as part of USA’s CIA MKULTRA program. In 1964 the US Congress supposedly shut down MKULTRA after a successful lawsuit against Cameron and McGill University by mind control survivor Linda MacDonald.

In these videos mind control survivors Claudia Mullen and Christina Nicola testified in the 1995 Congressional hearings about the CIA mind control of children. MKULTRA supposedly ended in 1964. However, in this video Jenny Hill discussed her 1965 witness to a child sacrifice under the direction of a CIA master mind controller thought to be head of the government’s program. The first fifty comments in this petition to Congress for an investigation of the CIA program, most by CIA mind control survivors, indicated that children were still being tortured even today in the government program.

Witnesses to these child sacrifices have alleged that the Ndrangheta Criminal Syndicate worked with police, Vatican and Catholic orphanages to provide children for torture and killing in monthly blood sacrifice rituals by the Ninth Circle. There have been 34 Catholic child mass grave sites found in Ireland, Spain and Canada. The grounds were believed to contain bodies of over 350,800 missing children although the respective governments and Catholic Church have refused ITCCS’s continuous requests for excavation.

Popes Francis and Ratzinger, plus Queen Elizabeth have all been named by eyewitness testifying before the ICLCJ Court as having killed and raped children in Ninth Circle Satanic Cult human sacrifice ceremonies. Over 60 eyewitnesses from several different countries have testified, with more contacting the Court each week.

Since 2011 six judges and 28 jury members of the ICLCJ Court have been litigating Ninth Circle Satanic Cult members. In Aug 2014 Pope Francis was found guilty of child trafficking; Pope Ratzinger resigned after his 2013 guilty verdict for Crimes Against Humanity and Queen Elizabeth and Prince Phillip were issued arrest warrants for their guilty verdicts in the 1964 disappearance of ten children from the Canadian British Columbia Kamloops Native Residential School.

The ICLCJ Court has over 450 Common Law Peace Officers in 13 countries, with 51 local chartered groups operating. Organizing funds were available for common law groups wishing to apply. To contact the ITCCS, ICLCJ Court in Brussels or to volunteer, email: itccscentral@gmail.com or hiddenfromhistory1@gmail.com.

About the Author
Judy Byington, MSW, LCSW, retired, author of “Twenty Two Faces: Inside the Extraordinary Life of Jenny Hill and Her Twenty Two Multiple Personalities” (www.22faces.com) is a retired therapist, Public Speaker, Activist and investigative journalist whose articles on international child exploitation rings have been cited on hundreds of blogs and websites. The ex-Supervisor, Alberta Mental Health and Director Provo Family Counseling Center is the CEO of Child Abuse Recovery and Speakers Bureau (www.ChildAbuseRecovery.com). If you have news tips about child abuse issues please email Judy info@22faces.com. You are invited to sign our petition to Congress for an investigation of the CIA mind control of children by clicking here: http://www.change.org/petitions/us-congress-survivors-request-investigation-cia-mind-control-of-children